Search for: "In Interest of LJ"
Results 361 - 380
of 980
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2012, 3:36 am
Going forward If the Supreme Court dismisses Oracle’s appeal, it will be interesting to see how this case progresses. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 5:27 pm
But Mitting J’s judgment is interesting for two reasons. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 12:44 am
” As did Nicklin J, Simon LJ accepted that the expectation was not invariable. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 1:45 pm
As noted at para 50 in Lewison LJ&rsq [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 2:57 am
The interest of CBI as sole creditor precluded execution (Sullivan and Briggs LJJ). [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 6:28 am
Sales LJ declined to rule upon the point, but he doubted that it did. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 11:18 am
Stephenson LJ – The judge was “right to make no difference between confidence and copyright for the purposes of this case” and “The problem before the judge and before this court is how best to resolve, before trial, a conflict of two competing public interests. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 12:38 am
At first instance, the Administrative Court (Gross LJ and Ouseley J) rejected KBR, Inc’s challenge. [read post]
28 Aug 2010, 12:50 am
In Lloyds Bank plc v Rogers ([1996] EWCA Civ 1277), Simon Brown LJ noted that “The correctness of Hilbery J’s decision in Davidson has been doubted and never yet tested. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 5:03 pm
At the same time, Buxton LJ expressly doubted Lord Woolf’s notion of “involuntary role models”. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 1:59 am
Arnold LJ adopted a different interpretation of Case C-98/13 Blomqvist v Rolex SA than the trial judge in reaching this conclusion.Permission for Amazon to appeal to the UK Supreme Court was refused by Arnold LJ in a subsequent judgment on form of order.Targeting is a tricky doctrine. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 2:53 am
Patel v K&J Restaurants [2010] EWCA Civ 1211 deals with a number of interesting questions concerning relief from forfeiture. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 2:53 am
Patel v K&J Restaurants [2010] EWCA Civ 1211 deals with a number of interesting questions concerning relief from forfeiture. [read post]
24 Jul 2010, 10:04 am
Pill LJ’s conclusion was as follows: 45. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 4:09 pm
He said the story had been in the public interest. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 4:05 am
Therefore, considering the judgment Sedley LJ in Redmond-Bate v DPP and the reforms to the Public Order Act 1986 ss 4A – 5 threshold, the law has established a clear framework. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:13 am
” He considered the principles established by the House of Lords in In re J [2005] and decided it was in Saleem’s best interest to return to Morocco. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 4:00 am
An interesting and important case for those dealing with matrimonial home disputes. [read post]
12 Sep 2009, 10:39 am
Carnworth LJ agreed with both judgments. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 11:59 pm
It will be very interesting to see how the Supreme Court has dealt with the issue of closed evidence more broadly in Al-Rawi; will it take the same strict approach when the liberty of the person is not at stake? [read post]
