Search for: "In Interest of T. S. III"
Results 361 - 380
of 6,797
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm
However, this jurisprudence does not invalidate the Board’s assessment mentioned above. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 6:33 am
Kortz wasn’t Maicowork’s successor in interest:Because Kortz admittedly has no protectable legal interest in Maicowerk’s purported goodwill and reputation, he cannot assert injury based on damage to that goodwill and reputation. [read post]
18 Apr 2021, 7:48 am
Here’s the piece I don’t understand. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 11:34 am
Or maybe there wasn’t really a spike after all. [read post]
5 May 2019, 2:30 pm
[Volokh Conspiracy / Reason] * Howard Wasserman identifies an interesting argument against police officers using body-worn cameras aka bodycams -- but as he also observes, we don't really have a better solution yet to the abuse of police discretion. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 5:46 am
NectarLux argued that Luxul failed to allege Article III standing. [read post]
20 May 2021, 2:57 am
In recent other Board decisions, the Board did not admit an auxiliary request of the applicant (T 1317/14, ex parte; Board’s objection could be derived already from the Board’s communication under Article 15(1) RPBA, hence no exceptional circumstances); (T 2214/15, ex parte; amendments made to overcome objections raised in the summons and leading to further objections do not represent an exceptional circumstance justifying admittance of new… [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 8:13 am
But isn’t that just ‘water cooler’ talk? [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 11:11 am
While Canada may move first on the issue, I should note that the SEC hasn’t let this important issue drop. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 10:46 am
Democratic oversight won't happen in the shadows Above all, we can’t have the debate all sides claim to want without a shared set of data. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 7:24 am
Lane is itself interesting because in it the Supreme Court accepts DOJ’s interpretation of Title II that imposes on Title II entities the same obligation to make reasonable modifications in policies and programs that is found in Title III even though Congress explicitly included that obligation in Title III but did not include it in Title II. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 6:06 am
We can’t remember a case about jurisdiction that’s generated such feverish interest as the one to be argued Monday at the U.S. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 9:30 am
"Ben" Zahn III rescinded his policy barring the city of Kenner's booster clubs from buying or accepting delivery of Nike products at the city's recreation facilities. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm
It can be expected of the parties to actively participate, in particular at the OPs, and to actively safeguard their interests. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 10:55 am
I don’t hold the judge’s army service against him. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 12:15 am
In this case there are also some interesting paragraphs about the selection of the closest prior art - the Board writes "The Examining Division made an attempt to apply both criteria... but failed to do so in a convincing manner. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 4:00 am
In Getting to Yes, Roger Fisher and William Ury describe techniques for identifying interests so that options can be developed that meet both party’s interests. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 7:28 am
It also raised objections under Article 123(2) EPC and for lack of novelty against the auxiliary request.It attached to its letter the following new item of evidence:D35: Copy of the Mr T B van Aken's publicly available entry in the "Linkedin" database.XI. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 1:44 pm
“Coca-Cola failed to explain how its supposed reputational injury adversely affected its commercial interests other than to speculate that a consumer dissatisfied with Meenaxi’s products might blame Coca-Cola. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 8:44 am
” Ordinarily, you don’t expect Justice Scalia to be asking anybody’s opinion about a question like that, much less counsel for one of the parties! [read post]
