Search for: "In Re: Grand Jury Subpoena"
Results 361 - 380
of 601
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2013, 11:38 am
After a week of not being able to find any substantial proof of the incident Joanne described, Wife moved back in with Husband.The State subpoenaed Wife two times to testify before a grand jury, once in December 2006 and once in April 2007. [read post]
22 May 2013, 10:51 am
The right also applies to grand jury and congressional hearings. [read post]
14 May 2013, 6:18 pm
The government serves a grand jury or administrative subpoena requiring production of vast quantities of documents in a very short time. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 4:30 am
Last year, in In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum,670 F.3d 1335 (U.S. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 10:31 am
Judge Levario dismissed the mortgage fraud indictment against Hill III this week after Craig Watkins declined to take the stand in her court and give sworn testimony on his decision to seek an indictment against Hill from the Dallas grand jury. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 8:22 am
But when the Jihadis walked right through “law enforcement” and blew up downtown that bright fall day, they blew up much of what the remained debatable in the debate about privacy and technology — or, at least, so it seemed, until a year ago, when the 11th Circuit issued an important ruling in In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated March 25, 2011, summarized here by Joel Hruska: [A] John Doe . . . was compelled to testify before a… [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 9:32 am
Lamberth, In re Grand Jury Subpoena, 846 F.Supp.2d 1 (D.D.C. 2012) - Ojetta R. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 5:59 am
He also faces an obstruction of justice charge for allegedly producing altered computerized accounting records after receiving a grand jury subpoena. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 9:54 am
The full citation is In re: Grand Jury Subpoena, No. 11-20750 (5th Cir. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 9:14 am
Ed. 2d 1021 (1990); In re Grand Jury Subpoenas, 89-3 & 89-4, John Doe 89-129, 902 F.2d 244, 249 (4th Cir. 1990) (acknowledging that the attorney-client privilege extends to “potential co-parties to prospective litigation” when the attorney is involved in the communications). [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 8:52 am
The full citation is In re: Special February 2011-1 Grand Jury Subpoena Dated September 12, 2011, No. 1:11-gj-00792-1 (7th Cir. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 6:19 am
Jack Townsend, Seventh Circuit Compels Production of Offshore Bank Under the Required Records Doctrine: The Seventh Circuit today decided In Re: Special February 2011-1 Grand Jury Subpoena Dated September 12, 2011, here, holding that the required records doctrine requires a taxpayer asserting a Fifth Amendment privilege to produce the documents required to be maintained under the FBAR statute. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 12:51 pm
11-3799 In re Special February 2011-1 Grand Jury Subpoena Dated September 12, 2011 [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 8:34 am
A federal grand jury is now involved. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
The most notable is In re Grand Jury Subpoena, 438 F.3d 1141 (D.C. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 6:19 am
In re Grand Jury Subpoena (Amazon), Case No. 07-GJ-04, W.D. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 1:11 pm
In In Re Grand Jury Subpoenas, 265 F.Supp.2d 321, the Southern District of New York held that “that (1) confidential communications (2) between lawyers and public relations consultants (3) hired by the lawyers to assist them in dealing with the media in cases such as this (4) that are made for the purpose of giving or receiving advice (5) directed at handling the client's legal problems are protected by the attorney-client privilege. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 1:00 pm
Hayes, 408 U.S. 665 (1972), to the Scooter Libby/Judith Miller case, are quite hostile to the idea of a privilege in the face of a grand jury subpoena, and as I noted in my response to Chris Bray’s thoughtful post, the policy of the common law is hostile to such a privilege: For more than three centuries it has now been recognized as a fundamental maxim that the public (in the words sanctioned by Lord Hardwicke) has a right to every man’s evidence. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 12:15 pm
Treble damages shall be available in cases of willful or wanton disregard by the party obtaining the subpoena. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 8:12 am
Recently, I received a grand jury subpoena to produce documents — and learned that the Food and Drug Administration, the FBI, and the Department of Justice are each investigating whether our company violated criminal laws by shipping a medical device that the government believes had not been approved for use by the FDA. [read post]
