Search for: "In Re: Mark Green v."
Results 361 - 380
of 658
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2016, 6:30 am
Supreme Court handed down its opinion in Young v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
Milhollin, 444 U.S. 555, 568 (1980) (citation and quotation marks omitted). [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 2:16 am
TTAB Finds RLX RALPH LAUREN Not Confusingly Similar to ROLEX for WatchesTest Your TTAB Judge-Ability: Two "Skateboarder" Design Marks for ClothingTest Your TTAB Judge-Ability: Is GREEN DOOR for Sex Club Services Confusingly Similar to THE GREEN DOOR for Restaurant Services? [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46) India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts (Spicy… [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46) India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts (Spicy… [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), Domain name transfer made easier: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), Quantum of obviousness in Australian patent laws - C Lawson: (IP Down Under), Separating Sony sheep from Grokster (and Kazaa) goats: Reckoning [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 7:58 am
We’re going after that. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
In Wilkes v. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 9:44 pm
(Reexamination Alert) Recapture doctrine before the CAFC: In re Mostafazedeh (Patents Post-Grant) US Patents – Decisions District Court S D New York: Patentee’s ‘sufficiently plausible’ belief as to the scope of patents negates intent to deceive necessary for false marking claim: Max Impact v Sherwood Group (Docket Report) District Court E D Texas – Marshall jury verdict for plaintiff; invalidity rejected even under ‘preponderance’… [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 3:41 am
TTAB Sustains MOZY v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 4:30 am
Waller v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 5:00 am
(citation and quotation marks omitted – both here and in the quotes that follow) (emphasis added). [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 6:00 pm
Signature Financial Group, Inc., and AT&T Corp. v. [read post]
30 May 2011, 9:26 am
You’re useless. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 4:50 am
These changes resolved the ambiguity about the standard to be applied and made it clear that the bill does not reinstate the free exercise standard to the high water mark as found in Sherbert v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 12:13 pm
Useful features, not patentable features; patents are a cheat sheet but ultimately we’re concerned about utility. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 5:54 pm
ShareThe Supreme Court on Monday heard oral argument in Patel v. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 7:00 pm
(Patent Prospector) US-Korea adopt patent prosecution highway (Law360) (Patent Docs) (Managing Intellectual Property) Global Global - General Obama, patent reform, patent litigation in the USA and Europe – IP Think Tank podcast 26 January 2009 (IP Think Tank) Intangible values collapse – the old 70% to 80% claim is now officially dead and buried (IAM) (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Managing value in a shrinking economy: the IP audit (IP Frontline) Downturn… [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 2:49 am
Last year was green; this year is a silvery-grey (right). [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 2:47 am
” And at his eponymous blog, Ross Runkel discusses the grant in Green v. [read post]
