Search for: "In Re: Mark M." Results 361 - 380 of 7,636
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2014, 6:27 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Marks aren’t considered in the abstract (as they are in the registration context) but rather as they’re encountered in the marketplace. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 3:50 am
"] In re Globus Medical, Inc., Serial No. 88676830 (December 8, 2020) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Christen M. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 3:38 am by Robin Shea
*I’m thankful that Mark Zuckerberg is taking paternity leave and setting a great example for dads (and moms) everywhere. [read post]
9 May 2019, 2:06 am
[I'm not sure how bedding made of down is identical to bedding made of percale, but I guess the latter could be filled with down - ed.].As to the marks, the Board found them more similar than dissimilar. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 3:24 pm
  Last year a whopping 35% of us were over 55 (MIPTC has hit the half century mark, but I'm not in that statistic yet, thank you very much). [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 1:50 pm by Mark Grossman
As a preliminary matter, let’s clarify that I’m using the broad term “IT” in a broad sense. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 12:59 pm by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Cxrouch In re Lizzo LLC (TTAB 2023) In a new precedential opinion, the TTAB has sided with the musical artist Lizzo — agreeing to register her mark “100% THAT BITCH” for use on apparel. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 3:46 am
In re L-Nutra, Inc., Serial No. 88757432 (December 3, 2021) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Christopher Larkin). [read post]
14 Nov 2006, 7:36 am
What I'm less agnostic about is the lack of societal value in status marks themselves. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 10:00 am
I'm still miffed over the TTAB's ruling that the mark THE TTABLOG is not inherently distinctive. [read post]