Search for: "In Re Adoption of Rule"
Results 361 - 380
of 13,403
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2024, 4:02 pm
Are the sweeping concessions in this legislation now similarly assured of eventual adoption as law? [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 6:31 am
This a lengthy ruling that was argued in April 2022. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 5:14 am
So some authorities have re-evaluated their tolerance for illness. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 3:59 am
SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF: WRONGFUL DISCHARGE AND REFUSAL TO HIRE California Labor Code § 98.6 THIRD CLAIM FOR RELIEF: SEX DISCRIMINATION California Gov’t Code § 12940 The first claim is based on CLC Section 1101, which states: “No employer shall make, adopt, or enforce any rule, regulation, or policy: (a) Forbidding or preventing employees from engaging or participating in politics or from becoming candidates for public office. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 11:04 am
” Justices Alito, Barrett, Kavanaugh, and Gorsuch voiced similar concerns about adopting such an expansive interpretation of Rule 10b-5 liability. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:12 am
” As a result, more companies operating in that state have undertaken a process such as IC Diagnostics (TM) to restructure, re-document, and/or re-implement their IC relationships in a customized and sustainable manner to minimize misclassification liability. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:30 am
On 26 April 2023 the General Court ruled in the case T-557/20 (SRB v. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 9:00 pm
In the article Pam Fischer, who oversees the New Jersey Teen Safe Driving Coalition, offers the statistic that, “Teenagers whose parents set rules and monitor their independent driving are half as likely to get into a crash as teenagers with no parental supervision; and they’re 71 percent less likely to drive while intoxicated and 50 percent more likely to use their seat belts. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 5:21 pm
And a recent Delaware decision, In re Dell Technologies Inc. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 6:56 am
“The solution is not a rigid rule” especially one that Judge Reyna: What is your problem with Rosen-Durling? [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm
”[3] Ultimately, the Colorado Supreme Court decided that “for purposes of deciding this case, we need not adopt a single, all-encompassing definition of the word ‘insurrection. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm
The Respondents have adopted exactly that position. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:42 am
Except that it seems that this would be a mandatory exclusionary rule, rather than one the authority can decide to adopt (as in Wales and as it used to be in England pre-Localism Act 2011). [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 3:57 am
There is usually a reason the rules are as they are. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 5:01 am
In In re Hubbard (11th Cir. 2015), the Eleventh Circuit relied heavily on United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 12:55 am
Some of this legislation has been enacted recently, and other legislation on this topic is making its way through the legislative process but has yet to be adopted. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 12:28 am
The court respectfully adopts the response of the DAC quoted at paragraph 23 above: the missional advantages outweigh the harm alleged. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:04 pm
ENDNOTES [1] See Petition for Rulemaking – In re SEC Rule Imposing Speech Restraints in Consent Orders https://www.sec.gov/files/rules/petitions/2018/petn4-733.pdf [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 3:23 am
While such reorganizations are about trimming costs, they’re also about preparing companies for a round of technical innovations that will lead to the transformation of business practices. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 10:30 pm
Against this background, it was not surprising that the ECJ, in Women who are Victims of Domestic Violence, re-confirmed the legal obligation to interpret the Qualification Directive in a manner consistent with the Geneva Convention in general, and the documents from the UNHCR in particular (see here, paras. 36-37). [read post]
