Search for: "In Re Baxter"
Results 361 - 380
of 467
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2009, 2:14 am
While we're on the subject, can we get judges to rewrite the New Jersey and Minnesota statutes of limitations to add a borrowing statute? [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Naturally, we’re most interested in the recall cases involving prescription medical products. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Naturally, we’re most interested in the recall cases involving prescription medical products. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Naturally, we’re most interested in the recall cases involving prescription medical products. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:09 am
Dauphin Co. 1999).Naturally, we're most interested in the recall cases involving prescription medical products. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 12:38 pm
DISTRICT ATTORNEY John Roach has announced that he will not seek re-election. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 5:51 am
Castro v Cartwright (TTABlog) TTAB reverses 2(e)(2) refusal of PROFUMO DE FIRENZE for perfume, finding double entendre: In re Atelier Profumo Artistico Firenze SrL (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB affirms failure-to-function refusal of STRENGTH IN DATA for brochures: In re ImClone Systems Incorporated (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB affirms 2(d) r [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 4:37 am
Baxter, No. 98 Civ. 4314 (SJF) (ASC), 2005 U.S. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 3:30 pm
Baxter, Chin and Corrigan, JJ., are of the opinion the petition should be granted. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 7:29 am
We're still waiting from the JPML for a ruling on Chantix, the smoking cessation drug, MDL No. 2092. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 2:39 pm
More than four years later, the California Supreme Court has announced exactly where those limits lie.The court's long-awaited decision in In re Tobacco II Cases, S147345, interprets two fundamental, voter-approved amendments to the UCL. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
Well, that request wasn't the kind of thing that had any time urgency on it, so we're only now getting around to it.We hope it's better late than never.The question of expert witnesses and warnings comes up because the learned intermediary rule only requires warnings to medical professionals - and not to ordinary people like plaintiffs/patients. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 5:00 am
We're always happy to help others who labor in support of our mutual cause. [read post]
26 May 2009, 1:42 pm
" George indicated that in the wake of Prop 8, the substantive right to marry identified by the court last year should be re-characterized as the right to have legal recognition for a couple's relationship that carries all the rights and benefits that are associated with marriage, but without using that term. [read post]
26 May 2009, 10:53 am
The majority opinion, 5-2 with Justices Kennard and George joining the three dissenters (Baxter, Chin and Corrigan) from In re Marriage Cases, is 136 pages long. [read post]
20 May 2009, 10:21 am
In the 4-3 decision of In Re: Tobacco II Cases, the Supreme Court overturned the trial and appellate courts, both of which permitted the defendant tobacco companies to decertify a class initially certified prior to passage of Prop. 64. [read post]
19 May 2009, 1:29 pm
Baxter Healthcare Corp., 533 F.3d 381 (6th Cir. 2008). [read post]
19 May 2009, 11:06 am
” In re Tobacco II (Baxter, J., concurring and dissenting), at 2 (second italics added). [read post]
19 May 2009, 9:29 am
They're not frivolous. [read post]
18 May 2009, 1:37 pm
According to today's 4-3 opinion by the Cal Supremes ( In Re Tobacco II Cases (May 17, 2009) ___Cal.4th___ (S147345)), only the class representative has to have standing. [read post]
