Search for: "In Re Doe, III"
Results 361 - 380
of 4,723
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2023, 12:30 pm
Heck does not bar. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 8:59 am
As a result, the law presumes that such information exists, and, if not, the Transparency Commission may order state agents to produce the respective document (art. 43 (III), General law; art. 57 (III), State law). [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 8:59 am
As a result, the law presumes that such information exists, and, if not, the Transparency Commission may order state agents to produce the respective document (art. 43 (III), General law; art. 57 (III), State law). [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 6:06 am
(Editor’s Note: This is Part III of a Just Security Symposium on United States support for the International Criminal Court’s Trust Fund for Victims. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 7:54 am
Why does this matter? [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 5:59 am
[xvi] Not only does the Consent Agreement require JAB to divest from [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 5:45 pm
Seems right to me.Or, as Judge Bea puts it: "After a party obtains declaratory relief which decrees that it is not infringing a trademark, does it retain Article III standing to invalidate that mark? [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am
The phrase “no nondegenerate” appears to be a triple negative, since a degenerate distribution is one that does not have a variation. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 3:00 am
The move by members of the Democratic National Committee was long expected, but it does not guarantee the calendar will ultimately be enacted as designed. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 4:30 am
If they're right about that, however, the relief they seek--invalidation of the program--wouldn't benefit them. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 12:00 pm
May an agency revive a defunct rulemaking without notice, and then immediately promulgate a lightly revised version of the proposed rule as a final rule? [read post]
5 Feb 2023, 5:12 pm
In the case styled: In re: Dissolution of T&S Hardwoods KD, LLC, C.A. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 11:55 am
But don’t blame them, they’re just doing their jobs–and that’s the problem. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 8:01 am
What does the Bank Secrecy Act of 1970 have to do with FATCA? [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm
”[14] The Commission has continued the expansion of Reg D as recently as 2020 under the auspices of facilitating capital formation for small and medium sized businesses.[15] So, the Commission coalesced around a narrow exception to the registration requirement for certain (i) private securities offerings, (ii) to a limited type of investor who had access to baseline disclosures, in order to (iii) allow our small business community to grow and thrive. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 11:47 am
§ 45(b)(9)(B)(iii). [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 9:56 am
It’s not ChatGPT’s fault that it’s a liar. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 4:32 am
But it does not follow that the non-parental sureties “would face similar … threats and harassment …. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 6:33 am
” In re Estate of Silverman, 628 NE 2d 763 – Ill: Appellate Court, 1st Dist., 2nd Div. 1993 Dealing with a hot-headed spouse is terrible. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 9:06 pm
Chapter III of the Act addresses prohibited acts, subjecting violators to both civil and criminal liability. [read post]
