Search for: "In Re Opinion of the Justices."
Results 361 - 380
of 14,099
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2010, 1:09 pm
While much of this ground is familiar to criminal procedure scholars, it is worth re-examining in light of Justice Stevens’ imminent departure from the Court. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 4:58 am
It’s June, and that means the Supreme Court will be issuing the last opinions of the Term. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 8:30 pm
Consumer lawyers Bisnar & Chase asked the Supreme Court to re-publish the Court of Appeal opinion. [read post]
30 May 2019, 2:42 pm
And doesn't expand tort liability one iota.I wanted to quote from one or two paragraphs of Justice Cuellar's opinion to identify just why the Court doesn't allow businesses who were clearly damaged by the Southern California gas leaks -- but that nonetheless did not suffer actual "personal injury" or "property damage" -- to sue for the profits they undeniably lost from the thing. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 5:44 am
They’re bigger than any one party. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 2:49 pm
Opinion by Justice O’Neill. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 2:00 am
But when we enter the well, we're just criminal defense lawyers. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
The opinion is well worth a re-read after Laffitte. [read post]
19 May 2020, 3:48 pm
Which definitely begins with a bang:"The opinion authored by Presiding Justice Ramirez is not a majority opinion. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 3:15 pm
But that doesn't mean the justices don't have an opinion about them. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 2:27 pm
The New York Times re-printed the opinion on Dec. 20, 1986 (see 1986 WLNR 835359). [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 4:36 pm
As Justice Butz does here. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 4:30 am
Professor Re and the emailer went on to say that Justice Kavanaugh was not saying that the instability caused by Chevron was itself a reason to overrule Chevron. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 10:16 am
It has three new inclusions from the last edition: Justice Agreement, Decisions by Final Vote, and a new chart we’re calling “Frequency in the Majority” (thanks go to Ben for this chart). [read post]
30 May 2007, 8:40 pm
Authors of majority have no reason to flaunt an opinion or make outrageous statements because, well, they’re opinion of an issue is now court precedent. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 1:52 pm
State of Indiana, a 9-page opinion, Chief Justice Shepard writes:A jury found appellant Otha S.... [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 4:05 am
Then comes the coup de grâce, qualified immunity, which was the actual subject of Justice Thomas’s opinion. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 2:01 pm
Zolo Agona Azania, an 8-page opinion on a petition for rehearing, Justice Sullivan writes:Azania was sentenced to death in 1982 and re-sentenced to death in 1996. * * * It is sufficient for purposes of this opinion to say that Azania's conviction for murder stands, but the death sentence has been twice overturned. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 10:11 am
So you're free to take public office; e.g., to be the dean of a public law school.It's a really great opinion. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 6:48 am
The justices’ vote represents a major milestone in the long-running debate over unpublished opinions, the sometimes-cursory dispositions that resolve upward of 80 percent of cases in federal appeals courts nationwide. [read post]
