Search for: "In Re Opinion of the Supreme Court" Results 361 - 380 of 16,187
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2024, 6:16 am by Michael C. Dorf
The Supreme Court recently granted cert in Glossip v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by Dean Falvy
Anderson, the Court has agreed to hear an appeal from the Colorado Supreme Court’s bombshell December 19, 2023 ruling in Anderson v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 9:36 am by Eric Goldman
Supreme Court has advised that courts “should not construe ambiguous writings to create lifetime promises. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 3:31 pm by Eugene Volokh
From In re Guardianship of J.H., decided today by the New Hampshire Supreme Court (in an opinion by Justice Anna Barbara Hantz Marconi): J.H. is a six-year-old child. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 2:19 pm by Hina Shamsi
The Supreme Court has repeatedly recognized students’ right to free speech, including in times of crisis. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 7:42 am by Austin Sarat
Along the way, there have been two independent investigations, each of which has shone a harsh light on the problems and misconduct that occurred in Glossip’s case.Those problems and that misconduct give the Supreme Court plenty of reasons to overturn Glossip’s conviction and order a re-trial. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 7:20 am by Stewart Baker
[Episode 488 of the Cyberlaw Podcast] The Supreme Court heard argument last week in two cases seeking to overturn the Chevron doctrine, which requires courts to defer to administrative agencies in interpreting the statutes that the agencies administer. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 5:50 am by Michael C. Dorf
Portland, there was no remaining ambiguity--no room to conclude, reasonably or otherwise, that a cable company that provides high-speed internet is not providing telecommunications services.The Supreme Court, in an opinion by Justice Thomas, reversed. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 1:40 am by Aaron Moss
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Andy Warhol Foundation v. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
Thus, I concluded that Justice Kavanaugh's reasoning is of a piece with calls by some of his colleagues to return us to the pre-switch-in-time Supreme Court's restrictive nondelegation doctrine and thus severely undercut the regulatory state.Thursday's essay received quite a lot of attention on social media, most of it positive, but some critical. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 4:00 am by SHG
They challenged that punishment in the Supreme Court. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 3:45 am by SHG
The concept made sense back in 1984, when the Supreme Court held in Chevron v. [read post]