Search for: "In Re People"
Results 361 - 380
of 116,801
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2010, 9:00 pm
Who keeps you company when you’re there? [read post]
5 Mar 2025, 8:34 am
“So, when someone makes a left hand turn they’re thinking it’s going to be safe. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 12:39 pm
" But the caption is "People v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
Recidivism—or re-offending—is an all-too-common outcome for those leaving prison, and we know from academic research that finding a good job can be a powerful deterrent to re-offending. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 8:13 pm
They’re saying no. [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 4:35 am
They happen to people from all walks of life. [read post]
1 May 2024, 1:34 pm
Shoemaker, Re-Placing Property, 91 U. [read post]
9 May 2014, 2:50 pm
The tour bus had a dozen people on board. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 4:37 pm
It's not enough to just look on Facebook and say "There are too many people with that name; we can't tell which is Father. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 11:56 am
People who rationally invested -- at some level -- in the actual company itself. [read post]
"Very few people are really supportive of free speech, whether they're liberals or conservatives..."
2 Feb 2011, 3:29 pm
The liberals on the Supreme Court today would still protect those people and their rights... [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 11:57 pm
The reality facing a would-be data intruder (i.e., a person attempting re-identification) is that in addition to frequent errors in online information, people move (and don’t always promptly update their address information); and some segment of any population is simply “off the grid”. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 3:30 am
Res. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 11:07 am
You're going to get sentenced to death for that. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 12:46 am
If they get caught and go to prison, they’re not any less likely to stop doing it when they get out. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 8:03 pm
Ross emphasized that Congress sought to prevent people from “taking the law into their own hands” by re-entering the country and challenging the prior order only upon indictment for re-entry. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 9:30 pm
New from McGill-Queen's University Press: Secwepemc People, Land, and Laws: Yeri7 re Stsq'ey's-kucw (2017), by Marianne Ignace (Simon Fraser University) and Ronald E. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 12:52 pm
But no matter the reasons one devalues the process, there’s little reason to violate it if you’re capable of following it. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 9:53 pm
In the case of the Wrights, people who arrived in the field later tried to use the Langley machine (which never flew)as prior art against the Wrights.See alsohttp://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2007/04/first-office-action-rejects-claims-of.html http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2006/08/on-obviousness-challenge-to-warfs-780.htmlhttp://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2006/10/uspto-grants-pubpat-re-exam-request-on.html [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 12:47 pm
“Those of us that got to serve with him are much better people and public servants for having had his mentorship. [read post]
