Search for: "In Re Petition of Church" Results 361 - 380 of 442
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2020, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
For The Wall Street Journal (subscription required), Jess Bravin and Brent Kendall report that “Monday’s announcement signals another step for the court’s conservative majority in re-examining the boundaries between church and state that some justices say improperly curtail many Americans’ religious exercise. [read post]
19 Jun 2021, 3:37 pm by Thomas Berg and Douglas Laycock
Barrett and Kavanaugh followed Smith here because, they said, they’re uncertain what would replace it. [read post]
22 Jul 2023, 4:45 am by jonathanturley
Phelps, also in 2011, the Court said the hateful protests of Westboro Baptist Church were protected. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 3:13 am
"Floda petitioned to be removed from the registry. [read post]
In a previous published New York case, a husband filed for a motion of summary judgment to dismiss a wife’s petition that alleged he had violated her order of protection. [read post]
1 May 2013, 8:06 am by John Elwood
  (The one released hold of which we’re aware, Cano v. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 6:44 am by Mallika Kaur and Harpreet Kaur Neelam
There was a petition started in Alberta against this accommodation. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 3:15 pm by Eugene Volokh
Prior to the re-filing of any Motion, however, this Court is ordering the parties to participate in a settlement conference. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 8:44 am by Dani Selby
He loved to make his sisters and mother laugh and helped his father out at his church in any way he could. [read post]
31 May 2012, 3:12 pm by SO Issues
[name withheld] says there was no such assault, he wasn’t adjudicated for it, never pled to it, but hasn’t had the money to petition to have it removed. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
For one thing, in neither case did the petition present the question whether to re-examine the practice of treating Title VI and the Equal Protection Clause as co-extensive. [read post]
5 May 2020, 5:55 am by Russell Knight
  If there are changes, well, at least you know what you’re agreed on and what you’re fighting about. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
(Inventive Step) (Patent Docs)   US Patents Applying Supreme Court precedent: Carlsbad Technology v HIF Bio (Patently-O) (Hal Wegner) USPTO not laying off employees (IP Watchdog) USPTO maintenance fees (Patently-O) Merchants warranty of non-infringement (Patently-O) PLI patent bar review tour (IP Watchdog) Provisional patent applications: waiting to file non-provisionals (Patently-O) 35 USC § 315(C) and its uncodified cousin – inter partes re-examination… [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 1:27 pm by John Ross
But they're still subject to employment terms negotiated by the union they disdain. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm by John Elwood
Back then, the Supreme Court denied the petition without even relisting it. [read post]
9 May 2014, 8:54 am by John Elwood
  (At this point, the question may be what case in the pipeline is so plainly devoid of vehicle problems that the Court skips what we’re guessing is a relist to run a final quality check.) [read post]
8 May 2007, 5:27 am
.: American Association of Retired Persons Abandon: To knowingly give up without intent to return or re-claim. [read post]