Search for: "In Re Stanford"
Results 361 - 380
of 2,721
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2008, 12:33 pm
You're behaving immorally. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 12:25 pm
(Yes, the Philip Zimbardo of the famous Stanford Prison Experiment.) [read post]
12 May 2019, 8:24 am
The problem, he said, is that they’re not looking deep enough. [read post]
24 Oct 2009, 1:18 pm
To do so know seems like they're bailing because Fairey no longer is the ideal, model, star client they hoped he would be for them. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 7:41 am
“Future Law 2015,” a conference “focusing on how technology is changing the landscape of the legal profession, the law itself, and how these changes impact us all” starts later today at Stanford Law School, organized by Stanford’s Center for Legal Informatics. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 7:43 am
Here, Stanford Law faculty members David Sklansky, Shirin Sinnar, and Greg Ablavsky discuss these historic events—and what may happen next. [read post]
8 Nov 2006, 7:01 am
Now let me ask two men while they're versed in the law to give me a laymen's education in this matter. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 10:07 am
The details of the re-analysis are reported on the Virology Blog here. [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 2:11 pm
Or else you’re over it already. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 4:35 pm
And while we’re here in the stacks, a link to Graham Greenleaf’s descant on Jon’s work. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 2:15 pm
(p.11) (Note, though not a new filing in 2009, an action against Vodafone Plc (LON/NYSE:VOD) that was dismissed end of 2008 was re-opened early 2009, to be dismissed again in January this year.) [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 7:58 am
(Stanford Law School) has posted Crawford's Aftershock: Aligning the Regulation of Non-Testimonial Hearsay with the History and Purposes of the Confrontation Clause on SSRN. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 4:25 pm
I mentioned earlier a panel discussion I participated in on robots, law and society at Stanford Law School a couple of weeks ago. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 6:41 am
It’s funny: Had the Danny Pang story broken in 2005 (or, for that matter, 1995), we’re guessing it would have garnered repeated front-page attention. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 4:27 pm
This was unfortunate for me, as there were times when he was the field expert and could have suggested appropriate reviewers, or mistakes in review, for grants coming from me at Stanford or Stem Cells, Inc. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 8:37 am
We’re trying to figure out the right balance for combining those elements. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 4:36 pm
Well, these are useful steps—but they’re modest ones. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 7:00 am
Although the near certainty of getting re-elected could point to the contrary, elected officials raise more money than ever. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 8:02 am
“In general, for most setups, if it’s a one-on-one conversation when you’re with coworkers or even strangers on video, you’re seeing their face at a size which simulates a personal space that you normally experience when you’re with somebody intimately,” say Bailenson.The short-term solutions to mitigate these issues are to reduce the size of your videoconferencing window, and try to move away from your computer monitor. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 11:52 am
Immediately after the Stanford blowout was complete, HD returned. [read post]
