Search for: "In Re Strauss" Results 361 - 380 of 457
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Aug 2009, 1:49 pm
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP 15. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 3:00 am
By Peter Friedman In Part One, we asked whether there is any solution to the problem created by mandatory arbitration clauses and class action waivers in consumer online transactions. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 10:22 pm
Sheesh, they're federal judges, give them a break! [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 7:31 am
This post is by my colleagues Mark Schonfeld, John Sturc, Barry Goldsmith, Eric Creizman, Jennifer Colgan Halter, Akita St. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 4:45 pm
Just visit the Career Center homepage, then use the dropdown menu to find the profile you're looking for. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 11:26 am
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP 11. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 9:27 am
Thomas Goldstein of Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, where there have been cuts, agrees that it's tough to justify a $250,000 bonus when a firm is considering letting go a staff person paid $50,000. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 9:46 am
If you’re in the DFW area, definitely consider attending. [read post]
28 May 2009, 1:42 am
The California Supreme Court's decision in Strauss v. [read post]
21 May 2009, 5:39 pm
" Tate said that could make laid-off workers more likely to file a discrimination complaint, since prospects of quick re-employment have dimmed. [read post]
21 May 2009, 1:59 pm
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld If you haven't done so already, click here to visit the Career Center, then use the dropdown menu to find the profile you're looking for. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]