Search for: "In Re U.S. Grand Jury Subpoena" Results 361 - 380 of 393
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2009, 3:47 am
Instead, they would have had to get a search warrant (Appellate Division) or a grand jury subpoena (New Jersey Supreme Court). [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 8:39 am
(To be able to take the 5th, you also have to be "compelled" to give testimony that incriminates you, but we'll assume that can be satisfied here; in the Vermont case, the laptop owner was subpoenaed by a federal grand jury, so compulsion was not a problem.)If we assume the owner of the laptop can, in fact, take the 5th and refuse to give up the encryption, then we seem to be at an impasse not contemplated by the drafters of the federal regulations governing… [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 2:30 pm
Among the powers agents now have for an assessment: Conduct surveillance without an otherwise required court order Obtain grand jury subpoenas for personal telephone and e-mail accounts Recruit informants for feeding information about a group or person to the bureau Examine records maintained by federal, state and local government agencies, which are typically not accessible to the public, like police databases profiling past criminal suspects … [read post]
12 Oct 2008, 9:21 am
Among the powers agents now have for an assessment: • Conduct surveillance without an otherwise required court order • Obtain grand jury subpoenas for personal telephone and e-mail accounts • Recruit informants for feeding information about a group or person to the bureau • Examine records… [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 10:23 am
So in the future, officers will have to go to a grand jury and get the grand jury to subpoena the records; I assume the relevancy issue comes up if the person whose records were subpoenaed later challenges the process used to obtain them. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 9:28 am
Then, according to the indictment, on April 16, the following conversation occurred when Beale made a call to an unindicted co-conspirator (identified as UCC): Beale: They had a grand jury meeting last night. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 9:16 pm
Here, the senator cited the example of the employees in the case, In re Grand Jury Subpoena: Under Seal, 415 F.3d 333 (4th Cir. 2005), who were confused about confidentiality because the company's counsel told them, "We can represent you as long as no conflict appears. [read post]
15 May 2008, 5:39 pm
" See Also: Teen Involved in MySpace Suicide Hoax Says Adult Also Participated No Charges Will Be Filed In Cyberbullying Case Federal Grand Jury Issues Subpoenas in Teen Cyberbullying Case Megan Meier Suicide Stokes the Internet Fury Machine Prosecutor Will Review Megan Meier Cyberbullying Case [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 12:44 am
   Schloemer, you may remember, worked with Hood's grand jury, and according to the Brian Ford notes, she discussed his potential testimony before the grand jury with one of the Scruggs Katrina Group attorneys. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 1:01 pm
Rosenthal is scheduled to appear before U.S. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 10:18 am
Grand Jury has issued subpoenas in the cyber-bullying case that led to the suicide of a 13-year old girl. [read post]
4 Jan 2008, 3:15 am
In In re Grand Jury Subpoena Dated Oct. 22, 2001, the court recognized a difference between "need" in the context of trial testimony, where corroboration is important, and need in the context of grand jury testimony, where the issue is simply establishing probable cause. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 12:29 am
[www.nylj.com] In re Grand Jury Subpoena Dated July 6, 2005 Subscription Required U.S. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 11:59 pm
2nd Circuit Backs Work Product Tape Subpoena New York Law Journal A subject of a grand jury investigation who, on advice of counsel, taped phone calls with a fellow broker to help protect himself cannot shield the recordings from prosecutors following a 2nd Circuit ruling. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 9:29 am
December 7, 2007).* Grand jury subpoenas were not used for mere fishing expeditions, and the defense was free to re-raise the issue at trial and did not. [read post]