Search for: "In The Matter of the Application of Public Law 16-1995"
Results 361 - 380
of 395
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2008, 9:55 am
Where "the evidence of the materiality of the misrepresentation is clear and substantially uncontradicted, the matter is one of law for the court to determine. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 2:41 am
Slip op. at 16 (citing Public Access Shoreline Hawaii v. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 5:30 pm
To exact an obligation to warn the user of unknown and unknowable allergies, sensitivities and idiosyncrasies would be for the courts to recast the manufacturer in the role of an insurer beyond any reasonable application of the rationale expressed above. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
S. 256, 259 (1979) ("Admiralty law is judge-made law to a great extent"); Romero v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 6:00 am
He was the director of the law school's summer study program in Chile in 1995 and 1996, and director of the law school's clinics from 1999-2003. [read post]
2 May 2008, 9:06 am
April 16, 2008). [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 3:00 am
These data indicate that policy driven by public safety concerns that are based on the notion that sexual offenders are inherently dangerous is misguided.The second, related difficulty in the specification of eligibility under the Act is the particular types of sexual crime that are defined as serious, and therefore relevant to the application of extended supervision orders. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
"Findlaw summaries [may] include opoinions that have not yet been released for publication and may be subject to modification, correction or withdr U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, April 10, 2008 US v. [read post]
20 Jan 2008, 3:26 am
The Missouri Sunshine Law requires public bodies to respond to requests for records within three days; the cause of any delay beyond that must be explained in detail.The department, through its spokesman Brian Hauswirth, responded three days later that it was gathering records and needed seven working days to review them. [read post]
23 Dec 2007, 8:00 pm
: (IPKat),Amazon gift ordering patent revoked by the EPO: (OUT-LAW), (IP Law360)Legal protection for databases: case report on dispute between the British Horseracing Board and William Hill: (OUT-LAW),Court of First Instance rejects Enercon's appeal to register a football-shaped wind turbine as a Community trade mark: (Mondaq.com),More on registrability of Tarzan's yell as a trade mark at OHIM: (OUT-LAW), (more from… [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 6:28 pm
We hope to help you learn more about [Georgia's] child adoption laws. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 4:52 pm
.- Plaintiff Michael Schmidlin brought this action against the City of Palo Alto and several of its police officers, alleging that the officers committed various constitutional and common-law torts when they detained and arrested him for public drunkenness. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 5:45 am
Nov. 1, 2007) ..............................................................1, 7, 16 Schwab v. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 5:45 am
Nov. 1, 2007) ..............................................................1, 7, 16 Schwab v. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 6:34 am
The panel majority does not review the district court's findings, and instead announces that this is a matter of "law. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 9:44 pm
It was introduced into US state law nearly 30 years ago and the first execution by this method was in 1982. [read post]
20 Oct 2007, 7:34 am
If an invention was either known or used in this country, or patented or described in a printed publication in the US or a foreign country, then the subject matter of the patent application is considered to be "anticipated" as information already in the public domain, and not a scientific advancement. [1] But what if the invention is known and used in a foreign nation, but not patented or described in a printed publication? [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 10:49 pm
The State's argument also rests upon an incorrect statement of the law applicable to Mr. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 5:34 am
This claim is predicated on newly discovered evidence and recent changes in the law. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 7:20 am
It's a particularly important issue because the Federal Rules require federal courts to adhere to state law with respect to privileges. [read post]
