Search for: "In re: A. O. "
Results 361 - 380
of 18,467
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2024, 11:04 am
As Justice Barrett indicated in her questioning, if securities plaintiffs cannot rely on Item 303 to establish a duty of disclosure, they will be forced to re-frame pure omission claims as “misleading statement” claims. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
On January 16, 2024, the Securities and Exchange Commission announced a settled enforcement action against JP Morgan Securities, LLC (“JPMS”) for violating Rule 21F-17(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.[1] Like other recent 21F-17(a) cases brought by the SEC, the case involved a claim that certain confidentiality language in an agreement with individuals would impede those individuals from reporting potential securities law violations to the SEC in violation of Rule 21F-17(a),… [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 7:16 pm
In the case of In re Danna T., the Suffolk County Family Court deliberated over a petition filed by E.O., the maternal grandmother of G.D., seeking visitation rights. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 6:56 am
And the court’s language should be open enough to ensure that we don’t have re-ossification of the law. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 10:46 am
At the same time the traditions of secrecy has also become an important part of the cultures of religious practice practice that are only recently being re-considered. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
La juge de première instance a rejeté la requête en rejet du chef d’accusation présentée par l’appelante, qui invoquait la préclusion découlant d’une question déjà tranchée et la règle du stare decisis horizontal dans la mesure où, en février 2020, elle avait été acquittée sous la même accusation. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
“They’re actively attacking our economic security, engaging in wholesale theft of our innovation and our personal and corporate data,” FBI Director Christopher Wray conveyed in a warning about the risk China’s activities pose to national security. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 4:54 pm
They’re machine-made goods. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 2:59 pm
Religious freedom cases—judges seem to take joy in being amateur theologians; do you see judges evidencing joy in aesthetic evaluations w/o admitting they do so. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 1:37 pm
You’re forbidden to remove/alter information at pain of $2500/violation. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 10:59 am
[Although these are presumptions about how consumers will think, so we’re not just expecting, we’re hypothesizing and holding as a matter of law.] [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 8:34 am
” In re Marriage of Byrne, 179 Ill. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 2:56 pm
Seems like relatively few women started business but you’re entitled to pass goodwill and inherit it and continue to operate. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 12:30 pm
New on the Short Circuit podcast: Two former Judge O'Scannlain clerks join the show to talk about a suspended progressive prosecutor and a preempted ban on gas stove piping. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 11:08 am
Zahr Said: Precision about what we’re trying to protect is useful! [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 9:03 am
In the first case, In re Honeywell Int’l Inc., Honeywell was sued for patent infringement in the Western District of Texas. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 7:22 am
If you’re looking for an adventurous retirement destination, you might want to retire in Brazil. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 5:01 am
In In re Hubbard (11th Cir. 2015), the Eleventh Circuit relied heavily on United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 4:03 am
The court relied heavily on In re Hubbard, In Hubbard, the Eleventh Circuit relied heavily on United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 1:27 am
[Re St. [read post]
