Search for: "In re 2012 Legislative Districting of the State" Results 361 - 380 of 833
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2016, 10:32 am by Shea Denning
That’s an impressive margin for a state that Republican nominee Mitt Romney carried by 2.2 percent over President Obama in 2012, and which Obama won by less than a percentage point in 2008. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 11:38 am by Cory Doctorow
Following on the 2012 passage of right to repair law for cars in Massachusetts, that state, plus Nebraska, Minnesota, New York, and Kansas, are all debating broader legislation covering digital products that tries to counter anti-repair laws like DMCA 1201 by requiring companies to take steps to make it easier to independently service your property: steps like publishing service manuals and making spare parts available. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am by Kevin LaCroix
Hawker,[10] a California district court likewise ruled that the California statutory business judgment rule does not apply to officers because the statute references only directors and because the legislative comments to that statute do not include officers. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 7:25 am by Jason Rantanen
Stoll, Maintaining Post-Grant Review Estoppel in the America Invents Act: A Call for Legislative Restraint, 2012 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 1 (Stoll.2012.estoppel.pdf) Paul Morgan, The Ambiguity in Section 102(a)(1) of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, 2011 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 29. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 9:48 am by Abbott & Kindermann
(G049691; 236 Cal.App.4th 1341; Orange County Superior Court; 30-2012-00593557.) [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 2:17 pm by John Elwood
But we’re going to have to leave those for Relist Watch SelectTM below, because I have to leave now to appear on a new talk show on the Gorilla Network. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 7:12 am by Rick Hills
The result is councilmanic indifference to general policy, obsession with district-specific "pothole pork,"and craven pandering to any organized interest who can fund campaigns. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 6:21 pm by Wolfgang Demino
Golden responds that compelling arbitration here would create an inherent conflict with the purposes and policies of the Bankruptcy Code, and for those reasons, the Court should not compel arbitration, and Firstmark's motion should be denied.JurisdictionThis Court has jurisdiction over this proceeding pursuant to Judiciary Code Sections 157(b)(1) and 1334(b), and the Standing Order of Reference dated August 28, 1986, as amended by the Order dated December 5, 2012, of the United… [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 4:21 pm by INFORRM
Google has successfully convinced a judge in the tech industry-friendly US District Court of Northern California (covering Silicon Valley naturally) to issue a temporary injunction nullifying the enforceability in the United States of an order from a Canadian provincial court in British Columbia (BC), upheld on appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC), to delist from its global search results all references to Datalink Technologies Gateways and its counterfeit product, an… [read post]
7 Sep 2015, 8:46 am by Gritsforbreakfast
(He'd been declared incompetent in an assault case by a Texas court as recently as 2012.) [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 9:05 pm by Alana Bevan
Democratic Governor Gretchen Whitmer, who filed the motion to block the law, had previously urged state lawmakers to enact new legislation delaying the requirements. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am by Joel R. Brandes
The ICWA and the federal regulations explicitly state that Awhere applicable State or other Federal law provides a higher standard of protection to the rights of the parent or Indian custodian than the protection accorded under the Act, ICWA requires the State or Federal court to apply the higher State or Federal standard@ (25 CFR 23.106; see 25 USC ' 1921). [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 4:00 am by Josh Blackman
I worried about the possible repercussions during the 2012 election if the Court struck down this landmark piece of legislation. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 11:57 am
    In re Avandia Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation, No. 11-2664, decided June 28, 2012, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a district court decision (Eastern District of Pennsylvania)[2], which dismissed the claim of Humana Insurance Company (“Humana”) and other similarly situated providers of MAOs against GlaxoSmithKline, LLC and GlaxoSmithKline plc (collectively, “GSK”) for reimbursement of… [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 11:57 am
    In re Avandia Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation, No. 11-2664, decided June 28, 2012, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a district court decision (Eastern District of Pennsylvania)[2], which dismissed the claim of Humana Insurance Company (“Humana”) and other similarly situated providers of MAOs against GlaxoSmithKline, LLC and GlaxoSmithKline plc (collectively, “GSK”) for reimbursement of… [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 10:03 am by Karin Johnson
  [1] Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration of the case. [2] In re Quality Stores, Inc., 693 F.3d 605 (6th Cir. 2012). [3] CSX Corp. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 7:56 am by Joe Palazzolo
LB: You’re also involved in the Texas redistricting litigation. [read post]