Search for: "In re Application of Google Inc"
Results 361 - 380
of 640
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2018, 8:16 am
Alzheimer’s Foundation of America, Inc., 307 F. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 9:16 am
This lobbying buys the company more time to apply more pressure by TikTok, Bytedance and “China, Inc. [read post]
21 Jan 2018, 3:15 am
NT1 v Google LLC [2018] EWHC 67 (QB) (18 January 2018) https://t.co/gfCZCY9xKn 2018-01-19 Piracy used to be file-sharing. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:09 am
Inc., Barclays Capital, Cisco Systems Inc., Credit Suisse USA Inc., Discovery Communications Inc., Facebook Inc., Fenwick & West LLP, Google Inc., Kimpton Hotels & Restaurants, McDermott Will & Emery LLP, McKinsey & Co. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 7:14 am
To preserve network competition in a market dominated by Visa Inc. and Mastercard Inc., the amendment also required issuers to make at least two unaffiliated debit networks available to merchants for transaction routing. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 3:00 am
Superior Court (NexBio, Inc.) [read post]
The Data Protection Act: a stone to sling at the Facebook Goliath? – Rhory Robertson and Sophie Pugh
28 Jul 2014, 5:10 pm
Following the recent decision in Vidal-Hall v Google Inc. ([2014] EWHC 13 (QB)), it seems that the English Courts are looking more favourably on applications of English Claimants to invoke (or invite) the jurisdiction of the English Courts to hear cases in this “developing area” of law. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 4:32 pm
In Vidal-Hall v Google Inc. ([2015] EWCA Civ 311) the Court of Appeal held that there can be a claim for compensation under the Data Protection Act without pecuniary loss and that misuse of private information is a tort, not an equitable wrong. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 1:41 pm
” The committee will call Tristan Harris, Co-Founder and Executive Director, Center for Humane Technology; Rashida Richardson, Director of Policy Research, AI Now Institute; Maggie Stanphill, Director, Google User Experience, Google, Inc.; and Stephen Wolfram, Founder and Chief Executive Officer, Wolfram Research. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 1:11 pm
Evident from usual surveys that courts accept that courts don’t really know what they’re trying to measure. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 11:14 pm
Applicants who rush to register marks based on current events often do not see their applications through to registration. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 7:25 am
Duffy, The Death of Google’s Patents, 2008 Patently O-Pat. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 10:00 pm
Google Inc., seven discovery-related motions were heard concerning this trademark infringement action. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 10:45 am
First DataBank, Inc., 115 Cal. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 5:21 am
Docracy team member Veronica Picciafuoco, was kind enough to talk to me about some of the potential uses and applications for Docracy. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 1:06 pm
| Gleissner trade mark application is Trumped | Book review: Who Owns the News? [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 11:07 am
AG Kokott provides some indications | Pepper gets spicy: The EPO President's Referral to the EBA | Book review: Accords de technologie / Technology Transactions | More Than Just a Game V - IP and the gaming industry | Event report: Retromark – the conference | Re-imagining Marie Louise Fuller's copyright of dance in Fuller v Bemis | Conference report: 'Injunctions and flexibility in patent law' | DSM Directive Series #3: How far does Article 14 go? [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 5:55 am
Borders, Inc., 2009 U.S. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 7:55 am
What they’re trying to gain here is an expansion of trade mark law. [read post]
