Search for: "In re Application of Johns"
Results 361 - 380
of 6,544
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2022, 2:33 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 11:00 am
" Therefore, the Board sustained this second refusal.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 5:09 am
BTW, I'm counting these three decisions as one precedential ruling, since the opinions are to a large extent identical.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 4:02 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
24 Aug 2006, 5:09 am
" 172 USPQ at 397.The Board noted that the more recent phantom mark ruling in In re International Flavors and Fragrances Inc., 51 USPQ2d 1513 (Fed. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 9:03 am
In re Rainscapes Construction, Inc., Serial No. 86906294 (January 27, 2017) [not precedential].Examining Attorney John D. [read post]
2 May 2007, 8:12 am
"You're sick. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 11:00 am
See In re White, 73 USPQ2d 1713 (TTAB 2004). [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 4:12 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 11:00 am
It therefore affirmed the refusal to register under Section 1, 2, and 45 of the Trademark Act.TTABlog wisecrack: Perhaps the Applicant might add this symbol adjacent the applied-for mark: Text Copyright John L. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 3:19 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 6:18 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 3:50 am
Discuss among yourselves.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 3:23 am
Maybe it will reach registration, maybe not.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 8:26 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 4:42 am
Applicants relied on other dictionary definitions ("A kind of cheese made in Gruyère, Switzerland), their own publicity and educational efforts (e.g., visits to trade fairs), policing of the mark (letters requesting cessation of use of the term), and Emmi Roth's agreement not to use the term "gruyere" as the name for it cheeses (although applicants admitted that some of the purchasers of cheese from Emmi Roth continue to label the cheese as… [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 3:17 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
17 Dec 2006, 3:12 pm
" Applicant did not dispute the Examining Attorney's contention, and so the Board, citing In re Albert Trostel & Sons. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 1:16 am
Arlow Ch outlined the applicable law [27] to [30], the special architectural and historic interest of the church building [31] to [33], the special significance of the memorial [34] to [35], and the historical context – John Gordon and Tacky’s Revolt [36] to [40]. [read post]
31 May 2019, 4:23 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
