Search for: "In re C. W."
Results 361 - 380
of 3,011
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2008, 12:11 am
Olinsky and Gary W. [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 6:19 am
We've seen those hundreds of people packed into a C-17. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 9:39 am
CONTU specified specific amendments & Congress followed, but you’re not happy w/specificity of results—any reason to think it would be better this time? [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 12:02 pm
Even here, one might ask whether notice failure adds much to our discussion, b/c issue is not so much metes and bounds of particular © as with patent, but rather w/the structure of © law itself. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 8:08 am
Permits member states to require re-investment of streaming revenue locally. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 9:16 am
Judges make decisions for reasons they’re not fully examining in claim construction. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 4:59 pm
TTAB is better suited, b/c at least get microcosm of LOC cases b/c of competing TM claimants. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 11:08 am
But it’s narrow protection b/c there are no choices. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 11:33 am
They perform well b/c they’re good at doing the task. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 6:28 am
C. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 7:54 am
We’re up to half a million applications a year. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 6:09 pm
”[3] The question presented before the Supreme Court is “[w]hether the refusal to register a mark under Section 1052(c) violates the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment when the mark contains criticism of a government official or public figure. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 2:46 pm
Cardi, W. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
c. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
c. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 9:00 am
Also relevant b/c other areas are more likely to be covered by WFH.Guy Rub: You’re suggesting penalty default is not an explanation, but it could be one explanation out of several.A: not making any claim about how often they’re contracting out; doesn’t know whether there is a contract that specifies. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 12:38 pm
Might still want to recognize some rights b/c they are material to consumers. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 11:49 am
Do we characterize books and movies as licensed when they’re digital, as we’ve done w/software? [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 6:28 am
Worth a read re: special needs. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 4:02 am
Transfer in gross/Buying TMs: powdered energy drink w/caffeine isn’t similar enough to a drink w/no similar ingredients but caffeine. [read post]
