Search for: "In re GREEN et al." Results 361 - 375 of 375
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2007, 8:18 pm
In terms of sex offenders, even studies with intense follow-up that do not depend on convictions do not reveal massive numbers of reoffences (Marshall & Barbaree, 1988; Marques et al., 1994). [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 9:00 am
William Marshall and Valerie Gooch Greene, et al (NFP) - "The evidence is sufficient to allow a jury to determine that the School Corporation's provision of only one supervisor created an unsafe environment where, over a period of time when he was unobserved by the single supervisor distracted by her other duties, a first-grade student could become frustrated by the actions of other students, which were also unobserved, and could react in accordance with that… [read post]
14 Oct 2007, 5:01 pm
ET, Robert Ambrogi will be hosting a panel on Online Dispute Resolution for the Massachusetts Bar Association. [read post]
13 Oct 2007, 7:52 am
… are lawyers, who have little training in climate change, physics, geology, geochemistry et al… the best people to get involved in Global warming? [read post]
21 Jul 2007, 8:28 am
MI Dept State, et al    Eastern District of Michigan at DetroitMICHIGAN CLASS ACTION SUIT RE SEX OFFENDER STATUTERONALD LEE GILMAN, Circuit Judge. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 12:34 pm
Greene Ramifications on the discoverability principle The issue of whether ignorance of, or mistake of the extent of, injury is an appropriate basis for postponing a limitation period was considered by the Supreme Court of Canada in Peixeiro v. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 2:24 am
On December 4, Kelley wrote to Sampson: "We're a go for the U.S. attorney plan. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 7:20 pm
That said, Slate.com opined whether PwC should be trusted with accounting the vote, given its numerous shennanigans with Lucent, PwC Japan et al. [read post]
31 Dec 2004, 7:52 am
Darryl Green, et al., 343 F.Supp.2d 23 (D.Mass. 2004), Criminal No. 02-10301-NG (D.Mass, Nov. 3, 2004) -a capital case- whereby there would be two juries, one non-death qualified to decide guilt or innocence, and a second death-qualified jury to, if necessary, decide on punishment. [read post]