Search for: "In re Jackson W." Results 361 - 380 of 398
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2009, 9:54 am
NLRB Law Memo 02/13/2009 by LawMemo - First in Employment Law. [read post]
30 Jan 2021, 3:19 pm by Eugene Volokh
… The next person who actually makes a complaint to the police, they're victims and I will tell you the justice system is a victim. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
During my 21 years at the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade (DFAIT) – now known as Global Affairs Canada (GAC) – I was privileged to represent Canada in a number of GATT, WTO, and NAFTA trade disputes and one somewhat obscure but important case under the Canada- U.S. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 11:03 pm
 [38] The owner of the music receives compensation for the sample not the artist him/her self. [39] This is why the Beatles don’t get paid if one of their songs gets sampled; Michael Jackson bought their entire library of music copyrights so he gets paid. [40]  The recording industry is the reason why copyright policy functions to maintain the monopoly. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:17 am by John Elwood
It’s assisted in that regard by the Fourth Circuit’s statement in a footnote that “[w]e recognize that courts are split on the interplay of Article III [standing] and” the Bankruptcy Code. [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:10 pm by cdw
The issue in Skinner is “[w]hether a convicted prisoner seeking access to biological evidence for DNA testing may assert that claim in a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Jan 2013, 4:18 am by Marty Lederman
  (Thus, on this second question, amicus Professor Jackson will be supporting the argument of at least one other litigant.) [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 3:47 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
First Court of Appeals in Houston hands down lengthy opinion in interlocutory appeal of complex dispute over who should hear and resolve subsidiary issue in a pending arbitration proceeding. [read post]
The SEC explained: [W]e believe that NEPA requires and authorizes the Commission to consider the promotion of environmental protection along with other considerations in determining whether to require affirmative disclosures by registrants under the Securities Act and the Securities and Exchange Act . . . . [read post]
3 May 2018, 1:50 pm by David Kris
It cited Justice Robert Jackson and other attorneys general taking the same position and making similar assertions. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 12:19 pm by admin
DuPont de Nemours and Company to review environmental safety procedures at its industrial plant in Belle, W. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 8:28 am by Paul Bland
by Paul Bland, Claire Prestel, and Melanie Hirsch The consumer and civil rights communities are closely watching AT&T Mobility v. [read post]