Search for: "In re Marks"
Results 361 - 380
of 29,899
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2007, 2:52 pm
" Yet Mark Shurtleff gives a clear and enthusiastic endorsement of Usana? [read post]
13 May 2024, 10:04 pm
No res judicata The Trade Mark Owner argued that the decision in the opposition proceedings between the parties constituted res judicata (Art. 63(3) EUTMR). [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 5:01 am
Newspapers in Australia are reporting that the re-trial of Mark Wilhelm, the man charged with the death of cruise passenger Dianne Brimble on the P and O cruise ship Pacific Sky, began today, Ms. [read post]
5 Feb 2006, 11:40 am
Mark Steyn on sensitivity and the Muhammad cartoon controversy, here. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 10:21 pm
It should be self-evident that "those accused of infringement" can initiate patent re-examination proceedings, and, in fact, many accused of infringement HAVE INITIATED re-examination proceedings. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 2:57 am
In re Wada, 48 U.S.P.Q.2d 1689, 1691 n.5 (TTAB 1998). [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 3:45 am
"As to the first specimen, Applicant pointed to In re Dell,Inc., 71 USPQ2d 1725 (TTAB 2004), where the mark QUIETCASE was not the primary mark displayed on the webpage specimen. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 2:23 am
Pryor is locked in a tight race for re-election with challenger Rep. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 4:05 am
In re Family Emergency Room LLC, Serial No. 86709923 (March 15, 2017) [precedential].Applicant described the relevant portion of its mark as "a white cross on a red field, [with] diagonal lines on the left edge of the field. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 7:00 am
“Great companies get great valuations, and we can debate what great is, but if people don’t feel good about the valuations, largely they’re not trading,” Mark says. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 1:59 pm
On January 19, 2013, Megaupload was re-launched as Mega under the domain name mega.co.nz. [read post]
20 May 2014, 9:16 am
Richard Re has another entertaining post at his new Supreme Court-focused blog, this time about the use of exclamation marks in judicial opinions. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 5:51 am
That made no difference to avaricious prosecutors, who proceeded to pursue a dubious prosecution because any executive even vaguely associated with AIG after the Wall Street meltdown of 2008 were easy marks. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 12:00 pm
In re Contractor Express, No. 76682478 (November 21, 2008) [not precedential]. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 4:07 am
The Board denied TMC's motion to re-open this 1997 concurrent use proceeding involving the mark ON THE RUN for retail convenience store services. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 3:27 am
In re HM Electronics, Inc., Serial No. 86162961(November 17, 2016) [not precedential].Applicant's mark did not include the over-the-head band, the ear cushion, the buttons, and the boom microphone. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 7:38 am
"The government cannot refuse to register disparaging marks because it disapproves of the expressive messages conveyed by the marks. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 7:54 am
Thanks to a recent decision, In re Forney Industries Inc., Appeal No. 2019-1073, by the US Federal Circuit Court of Appeals (Federal Circuit), it may now be easier for businesses to obtain federal trademark registration for some color-based product packaging trade dress. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 2:48 am
In re Carroll Hall Shelby Trust, Serial Nos. 77355668, 77356004, and 77356033 (August 16, 2012) [not precedential].The Board found the goods to be legally identical, and it presumed that they travel in the same normal channels of trade to the same classes of consumers. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 4:00 pm
"Mark Lankford has maintained his innocence from day one," Kovis said... [read post]
