Search for: "In re McKenna"
Results 361 - 380
of 556
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2022, 2:22 pm
McKenna: but sometimes the core shifts. [read post]
11 May 2016, 4:00 am
McKenna agrees. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 8:58 am
Session 1: The Distinction Between Trademark and Unfair Competition LawIntroduction: Mark McKenna: Until mid 20th c, could have said that TM and UC were distinct legal claims that vindicated the same right; thus cts said that TM was a species of UC. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 2:45 pm
If what you’re doing is likely to stay under the radar/not make much money, don’t ask permission. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 7:35 am
Doctrinal error: they’re more guidelines to be balanced than elements to be satisfied. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 4:56 am
We’re Just Getting Going - http://tinyurl.com/42h3ctg (Chris Dale) What Are We Waiting For? [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 5:56 pm
" This was swiftly followed by Patrick McKenna writing in LegalOnRamp, "The demand side of the market is not demanding. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 8:47 am
McKenna isn’t here so I’m gonna say Dastar is relevant, especially to the fan activities. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 9:17 am
“[V]iewing the record in Uncommon’s favor, as we must, the similarity of the marks favors Uncommon, albeit slightly,” as did product similarity and area/manner of use (they’re sold nationwide through online retailers). [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 1:10 pm
Affecting TM law (as set forth in new paper with Mark McKenna, which is excellent). [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 8:00 am
And they're not necessarily playing nice about it. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 4:05 pm
But we're not about whether they can or do work; we're about whether they're optimal, and I cannot believe in the long run they are. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 2:00 am
McKenna Quint and Robby Kwok are just a couple of early examples. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 3:42 am
Face it, you’re a racist. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 8:00 am
And they're not necessarily playing nice about it. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 3:33 pm
Only because, as we're about to see, "profits" in law firm land have a special meaning, and that's why they're imperative. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 1:05 pm
Already we’re starting to see the details wearing away. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 8:19 am
What we’re looking for here is any extra element that would allow the claim to escape preemption. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 2:55 am
SEC & PCAOB Revive Chinese Auditor Scare This MarketWatch article by Francine McKenna says it all about this recent joint SEC/PCAOB statement about the lack of regulator access to audits of Chinese companies that are listed in the US. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 3:00 am
As indicated by the following from Francine McKenna’s article, the first criteria would have been met more than a year ago: “Stumpf testified management and the board was informed of the issues in 2014. [read post]
