Search for: "In re Mortgage Foreclosure Cases"
Results 361 - 380
of 1,646
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2014, 6:44 am
The merit decision in In Re M.W., 2012-Ohio-4538. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 10:06 pm
For those homeowners that renegotiated their mortgages, faced a short sale or suffered a foreclosure, the potential tax consequence as a result of forgiven debt was mitigated when Congress passed the Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act in 2007. [read post]
Oral Argument Preview: Some Post Schwartzwald Foreclosure Standing Stuff. Bank of America v. Kuchta.
30 Dec 2013, 7:03 am
The case was subsequently delayed due to bankruptcy but was re-activated on March 26, 2013. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 9:24 pm
There is a real concern that the Dodd-Frank Act’s mortgage reforms will reduce the availability of mortgage credit because lenders’ fear liability for making mortgage loans that fail to qualify as “Qualified Mortgages” (QM) and are thus potentially subject to an Ability-to-Repay (ATR) defense. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 4:24 pm
July 2014 is the deadline that they’re trying to beat. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 11:02 am
In past cases, the Supreme Court found mandamus relief appropriate after a delay of more than 8 months, see In re Government of the V.I., S.Ct. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 6:30 pm
They claimed that the doctrine of res judicata barred this double use. [read post]
1 Dec 2013, 8:35 pm
Nine defendants have been indicted in two separate mortgage fraud cases. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 8:55 am
These are what are known as secured debts and some examples are mortgages, car loans, and boat loans. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 10:30 am
As the case progressed, Alakozai and his wife filed a series of bankruptcy petitions, hoping to prevent the foreclosure. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 11:37 am
Mitchell, No. 116311 – Issue Presented: Did the defendant in a foreclosure case waive objections to personal jurisdiction by failing to raise those objections in compliance with Section 2-301 of the Code of Civil Procedure and Section 15-1505.6 of the Illinois Mortgage Foreclosure Law? [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 3:37 pm
They’re NOT. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 2:05 pm
The issue in this case is whether defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing Plaintiff's complaint seeking foreclosure of a mortgage against her home should be granted. [read post]
18 Aug 2013, 9:06 pm
Is it mortgage foreclosure? [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 5:07 pm
The lenders and secondary mortgage purchasers, including Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, suffered losses as a result of the foreclosures. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 8:50 am
They’re renters. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 3:37 pm
(These are homes with mortgages where the mortgage servicer or lender has begun foreclosure but it’s still in process.) [read post]
28 Jul 2013, 9:06 pm
The majority of the mortgage payments for the homes were not paid and the homes went into foreclosure. [read post]
28 Jul 2013, 5:36 pm
Seller’s Disclosure A leading case of Johnson v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 7:13 am
The second, “possessory writ,” transforms that first writ into a security interest akin to a mortgage with a right of foreclosure. [read post]
