Search for: "In re TM"
Results 361 - 380
of 1,023
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2016, 2:03 pm
They’re both pushing stuff. [read post]
20 May 2016, 12:25 pm
They’re more persuaded that the harms TM is trying to police, so even on the same balance the harms win. [read post]
20 May 2016, 10:07 am
Does interference w/TM interests matter any more than other deception? [read post]
20 May 2016, 8:40 am
Said: we’re not all on the same page on harm. [read post]
19 May 2016, 1:37 pm
One option is the TM registration practice—have an institutional email address, and when relevant events happen, there could be a notification system. [read post]
3 May 2016, 2:41 pm
We’re all miserable. [read post]
2 May 2016, 9:20 pm
512(l): failure to qualify for safe harbor doesn’t necessarily mean they’re liable for infringement. [read post]
1 May 2016, 7:32 am
After Alvarez, this can’t be true unless TM registration is commercial speech. [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 3:28 pm
[P.S.: the answer with © and TM is: no.] [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 2:00 pm
The Washington football team & In re Tam. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 11:04 am
Hard Rock guests can end Tax Day on a high note with free Local Legendary(tm) Burgers for those willing to take the stage and Sing for their Supper! [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 4:50 am
What if they’re garden-variety categories? [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 11:55 pm
After much ado, the TM Registry has granted a grace period of 3 weeks (until 30th April 2016) allowing all applicants who had filed their responses to re-send copies of their responses. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 8:56 am
They’re great for registering things like slogans and “tropes. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
Website owner has right to modify code of developer Crochetière-Brousseau v. 9107-0234 Québec Inc. 2015 FC 1219 https://t.co/SxVJPkZQG4 -> CSA v Knight CSA retains copyright in its code https://t.co/prx9wVK2px -> Making software available through a website is TM use of a good? [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
Website owner has right to modify code of developer Crochetière-Brousseau v. 9107-0234 Québec Inc. 2015 FC 1219 https://t.co/SxVJPkZQG4 -> CSA v Knight CSA retains copyright in its code https://t.co/prx9wVK2px -> Making software available through a website is TM use of a good? [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 1:25 pm
Content can’t be disclosed to third parties, who might still be told they’re bound. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 11:42 am
RT: In Barnett’s model, what are TMs for? [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 9:25 am
Patent law doesn’t require cause in fact; neither does TM law. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 7:49 am
And now she gets to wear “TM” bling too. [read post]
