Search for: "In re Williamson" Results 361 - 380 of 674
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2012, 7:52 pm by John Bellinger
  The Supreme Court has ordered re-argument on the extraterritoriality issue for October 1, the first argument on the first day of the term. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 12:46 pm by Donald Barbati
 “We’re not going to just sit back while this happens; we’re looking at all legal options. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 12:46 pm by Donald Barbati
 “We’re not going to just sit back while this happens; we’re looking at all legal options. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 11:13 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
In 2008, the CFC ruled in favor of the property owners, but the Federal Circuit reversed on Williamson County grounds because the case wasn't administratively ripe. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 2:13 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
Today, we're sure that those on the regulatory side of the table are doing just that, because the Court declined to review the Third Circuit's decision in R&J Holding Co. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 1:00 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Aaron Williamson, Counsel, Software Freedom Law Center. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 1:07 pm by Jeff Gamso
  And sometimes, at least sometimes, that means being willing to re-examine the evidence. [read post]
30 May 2012, 11:21 am by Steve Hall
Earlier: Jana Duty was winning the race for Williamson County district attorney with 97 percent of the precincts counted about midnight, according to Williamson County’s website. [read post]
7 May 2012, 12:00 pm
But when a prosecutor withholds evidence that could have prevented someone from being wrongly convicted, we're lucky if we ever find out about it. [read post]
7 May 2012, 5:38 am by Gritsforbreakfast
The trial testimony about fire and arson was all hokum, it was the only directly inculpatory evidence presented to the jury, but Williamson County DA John Bradley insisted that just because there's no evidence of arson doesn't mean it couldn't have happened. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 9:57 pm by Max Kennerly, Esq.
Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 509 U.S. 209 (1993), virtually no plaintiff has actually prevailed on a predatory pricing claim. [read post]