Search for: "In the Matter of Jackson" Results 361 - 380 of 5,170
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2023, 6:25 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
From the Judiciary’s institutional perspective, moreover, allowing a case to proceed simultaneously in the district court and the court of appeals creates the possibility that the district court will waste scarce judicial resources— which could be devoted to other pressing criminal or civil matters—on  a  dispute  that  will  ultimately  head  to arbitration in any event. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:34 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Plaintiffs Jackson Land and Cattle, LLC, JLC Ranch Development, LLC, and JLC Ranch, LLC are Delaware limited liability companies that own the Wyoming Property, which are controlled and indirectly owned by Fields (id., ¶14). [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 2:14 pm by Eugene Volokh
As a general matter (to oversimplify slightly), the First Amendment rules are much the same in criminal and civil cases based on speech. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 1:01 pm by Sarah Squillante
However, a few lines from Justice Jackson’s dissent may later prove powerful: decisions on these matters tend to be fact-based; their impact is limited to situations which bear incredible factual similarities to the case being decided. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 1:01 pm by Sarah Squillante
However, a few lines from Justice Jackson’s dissent may later prove powerful: decisions on these matters tend to be fact-based; their impact is limited to situations which bear incredible factual similarities to the case being decided. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 3:58 am by SHG
Or will they merely react to the Supreme Court as Jackson did to Marshall? [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 9:06 am by Amy Howe
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson disagreed; she would instead have dismissed the case as improvidently granted. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
Justice Kavanaugh wrote for the majority, which comprised himself, Chief Justice Roberts, and Justices Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 4:30 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Justice Kavanaugh wrote for the Court, joined by the Chief Justice and Justices Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 3:15 am by Seán Binder
In their dissent, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson and Justice Sotomayor rejected the majority’s approach and said the court should have struck down the law on First Amendment grounds. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:14 pm by Josh Blackman
Immigration enforcement is a civil, rather than a criminal matter. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 9:58 am by Eugene Volokh
But the trial court here took judicial notice of the truth of disputed factual matters. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 6:37 am by Noam Biale
It does not matter that an intervening decision of this Court confirms his innocence. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 9:28 am by Michael C. Dorf
Instead I want to focus on an important disagreement between Justice Jackson and the majority.In favor of her reading of subsection (e), Justice Jackson invoked, among other things, the principle of constitutional avoidance. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 6:41 am by Christine Corcos
Jackson Women’s Health Organization, it is only a matter of time before the present state of reproductive constitutionalism solidifies into the more authoritarian “Dobbs Era. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 6:41 am
Jackson Women’s Health Organization, it is only a matter of time before the present state of reproductive constitutionalism solidifies into the more authoritarian “Dobbs Era. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 8:15 am by Eric Columbus
No surprise there: The provisions address vastly different matters and can easily be read in conjunction. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 7:54 am by Epstein Becker Green
Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision by the United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS). [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 5:58 am by Michael Stern
Recent weeks have seen a flurry of investigative activity on Capitol Hill, including probes by House committees into Hunter Biden and Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s New York indictment of former president Donald Trump, demands by Senate committees for information about Supreme Court ethics rules and gifts received by Justice Clarence Thomas, a subpoena from the House Foreign Affairs Committee to obtain access to a key State Department document regarding the Afghanistan withdrawal,… [read post]