Search for: "Ives, A. v. Ives, K."
Results 361 - 380
of 627
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2022, 9:01 pm
New Disclosure Requirements — Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K The final rules require companies to include in those proxy or information statements that are required to include executive compensation disclosure a new “Pay Versus Performance” table with the following information: the total compensation of the CEO and the average total compensation of the other NEOs using the information currently required to be reported in the Summary Compensation Table in the proxy… [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 3:55 am
“Failure to include a statement in compliance with Rule 201(k) should result in dismissal of the motion [to compel]” Brandt v. [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 5:30 am
§§ 1058, 1141(k) para la radicación de declaraciones juradas de uso continuo o falta uso excusable; (3) el plazo para la presentación de una renovación bajo 15 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm
Not an easy read, though.Amendments[2] Compared to claim 1 as originally filed, claim 1 of the main request has been amended by (i) restricting the definition of component (A) from “an organic C2-8 dicarboxylic acid or salt thereof” to malic acid or a salt thereof, (ii) restricting the definition of component (B) from “at least one or more of an organic solvent selected from the group consisting of aromatic alcohols, N-alkylpyrrolidones, alkylene carbonates, polypropylene… [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 11:33 am
State v. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 3:19 am
[v] The SEC Certainly the majority of the federal activity on cyber security issues has come from the SEC. [read post]
31 Mar 2022, 2:22 pm
” Custer v. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 7:19 pm
Recently, the Appellate Division revisited this issue in the unpublished matter of Cathrall n/k/a Greenberg v. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 3:00 am
However, in State v. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 4:06 pm
Ives, M. [read post]
4 Apr 2009, 6:26 pm
Ives, M. [read post]
16 May 2024, 1:24 pm
The actuarial statement is based upon the plan actuary’s (i) reconciliation of census data, (ii) review of assumptions and experience study, (iii) review of actuarial methods, (iv) review of liabilities, (v) review of contribution calculations and (vi) review of the valuation report. [read post]
19 May 2017, 12:23 pm
Co. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:36 am
Moreover, with respect to that one of the two options a RFRA claim is virtually foreclosed by the Court’s unanimous 1982 decision in United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 4:45 am
PARTIDO POPULAR DEMOCRÁTICO (David Bernier)Descarga el programa de gobierno (PDF) (P. 73) K. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 9:01 pm
” (v) “How often is your account rebalanced? [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 2:05 pm
[iv] Plaintiffs alleged the SPAC’s management team, including multiple Riverstone partners, made misleading, overly optimistic financial projections in its pre-merger proxy statement, which were then dramatically reduced in Alta Mesa’s first 10-K filed post-merger. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 2:50 pm
Doe A. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC sets strict standards to establish inequitable conduct: Star Scientific v R J Reynolds Tobacco: (Hal Wegner), (Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (Patently-O), (more from Patently-O), (Philip Brooks), (Law360), (I/P Updates), Safe harbour ruling in Io v Veoh could help YouTube in Viacom… [read post]
