Search for: "JANE AND/OR JOHN DOES"
Results 361 - 380
of 1,055
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2010, 6:00 am
So in recent porn thievery lawsuit news, the mass defendant approach to joinder shows no signs of abating-porn companies are doubling down on lawsuits targeting hundreds of John and Jane Does using Bittorent to procure copyrighted porn movies. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 12:30 pm
Transgender man seeks to change his legal name (from Jane Doe to John Doe) but cannot because Indiana law governing name changes requires proof of U.S. citizenship; he is not a citizen but an asylee. [read post]
14 May 2007, 8:48 am
"John Doe" does not. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 4:19 am
But Andrew Miltonberg wasn’t so lucky when it came to his John Doe’s suit against Columbia University. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 2:48 pm
For example, say Jane and John have reciprocal No Contact Agreements. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 6:03 am
Here's an excerpt from the facts: John Doe and Jane Roe were students at the University of Michigan. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 8:14 am
Which brings me now to John Baker, Ph.D. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 10:31 am
For example, let’s say John Smith’s car gets rear-ended by Jane Doe’s car; Jane Doe would have committed a negligent act and John Smith would have been the plaintiff (and the one who was wronged) in this instance. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 1:19 pm
JANE DOE, is the mother and next friend of JOHN DOE, a minor. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 10:48 am
Securing equality between Jane and John by providing the latter with more food is an example of a case in which improving the lot of a person also happens to realise equality. [read post]
17 Aug 2019, 7:06 am
"So what fuckin' difference does it make? [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 9:50 am
” To which I would add, that is because al-Qa’ida does not belong to Muslims. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 2:28 am
It’s a matter of common sense and fairness.If hearsay weren’t excluded, John Doe could take the stand and say Jane Doe told him the defendant – Richard Roe – who’s on trial for murder confessed to the whole thing. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
John then takes the stand and testifies that he did not rob Jane and that he has no idea what Jane is talking about. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 2:26 pm
So, too, does Wide Sargasso Sea by Jean Rhys, a "prequel" to Charlotte Bronte's Jane Eyre. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 11:44 am
So if Jane is going to get the AT&T stock that was a wedding gift 25 years ago and worth $100,000 today and John is going to get the money market account with $100,000, it’s really not an equal distribution of assets, because Jane is getting an asset that is going to be taxed. [read post]
25 Jan 2020, 3:45 pm
From Doe v. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 3:50 am
While the plaintiff was talking to a store employee there were two other customers behind him (referred to as John Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2). [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 3:50 am
While the plaintiff was talking to a store employee there were two other customers behind him (referred to as John Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2). [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 10:45 am
For example, suppose candidate John Smith were to claim that his opponent, incumbent Jane Doe, "would be in favor of budget measures that would cost individual taxpayers up to $3,000. [read post]
