Search for: "JONES v. BLACK" Results 361 - 380 of 576
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2022, 1:42 pm by ACLU
v=wfqUk0tdjkgUsing people’s names and pronouns is a matter of respect. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 3:07 pm
Now it's time to tell you all about the trial of the substantive issue -- and here to tell it is Cerryg Jones (head of Brands & Designs at Wragge & Co LLP, which acted for the successful claimant. [read post]
8 May 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  They narrate the story—in which the Cherokee Nation’s startling victory in Worcester v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 11:36 am by Katherine Pompilio
Kurup posted the unanimous court decision in FBI v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
  It ends with Guido’s clerkship with Justice Black, his academic path, and reflections on his paradigm-shifting scholarship. [read post]
8 May 2009, 12:26 pm
  The Supreme Court has granted cert. in U.S. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 5:00 am
Jones’ deposition, you can search for “Jones” and all documents where he is referenced will be identified. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 3:27 am
Apr. 16, 2009)(Unpub)Affirming dismissal of 47yo Black male's age/race discharge discrim suit7th CircuitØ Brooks-Ngwenya v. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 6:56 am by Jeff Welty
” The status of the morning after pill has been a key issue since the Supreme Court overruled Roe v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
Justice Hugo Black emphasized the text and what he said were the original understandings, but his view was not accepted by the Warren Court as a whole. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 10:51 pm by The Legal Blog
A statement in a balance sheet presented to a creditor-shareholder of a Company and signed by the Directors or their agents is sufficient acknowledgement (Jones v. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 12:48 am
The black letter of the Third Restatement, concerning product liability is even less precise:In connection with liability for defective design or inadequate instructions or warnings. . .a product's noncompliance with an applicable product safety statute or administrative regulation renders the product defective with respect to the risks sought to be reduced by the statute or regulation[.]Restatement (Third) of Torts: Products Liability §4 (1997) (emphasis added).The problem with… [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
Jan. 22, 2009)Affirming that multiple plaintiff claims of discrimination etc were frivolous and that a plaintiff's attorney engaged in sanctionable conduct; remanded $660K+ atty fees order for more refined computation of amounts>> Noted here: Central Ohio Employment Law Update7th Circuit>> Jones v City of Springfield, No. 08-2085 (7th cir. [read post]