Search for: "Jack Doe 2"
Results 361 - 380
of 2,275
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2011, 8:43 am
But what does all this really prove? [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 9:37 pm
The authority granted in section 2 does not authorize the use of the United States Armed Forces on the ground in Syria for the purpose of combat operations. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 12:01 am
It does, however, offer a reminder. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:41 am
Trump Case No. 9:23-cr-80101 Charging instruments and Arraignment Superseding Indictment charging a third defendant, Carlos De Oliveira, with four counts, and adding three counts against Trump and two counts against Nauta (July 27, 2023) Indictment of Donald Trump and Waltine Nauta (June 8, 2023) Trump waiver of appearance at arraignment, and entry of not guilty plea (Aug. 4, 2023) Government notice of superseding indictment (July 27, 2023) Minute order for Nauta initial appearance and arraignment… [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 6:52 am
“Chrissy’s bubble-headedness stands in sharp relief to Jack and Janet’s prayers for God to help Chrissy. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:22 pm
Other than than us down-in-the-trenches condemnation lawyers, and property owners who are being jacked by lowball government offers, the issue does not boil the blood. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 8:02 am
[2] Jack v. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 9:24 am
Rule 506 was adopted as a safe harbor under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, which provides that securities sold "by an issuer not involving any public offering" are exempt from registration under the Act. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 4:14 pm
Jack predicted much of this back in 1999; he and Tim Wu, Peter Swire, and others showed that states would not shy away from asserting territorial control over Internet. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 3:40 am
As Columbia law student Jack Starcher recognizes in his note, Addressing What Isn't There: How District Courts Manage the Threat of Rule 68's Cost-Shifting Provision in the Context of Class Actions, 114 COLUM. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 4:44 pm
(She was term-limited in 2014, and spent the next 2 years running for President.) [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 10:27 am
--Jack J. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 4:56 pm
That Jack Balkin's parody strikes a nerve is clear when one considers that the discussion about this matter is in fact being seriously debated elsewhere (see Legal Theory Blog).Update 2: Of course, in his own way, Balkin is also an originalist himself, although one who subscribes to a somewhat different doctrine. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
Call this MFN-2. [read post]
23 Dec 2012, 12:10 pm
And for this purpose, there is no better resource than the revised edition of Jack Finegan's Handbook of Biblical Chronology. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 7:59 pm
Id. at *2. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 5:07 pm
Does Balkin agree with Judge Robert H. [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 9:03 am
But so far, we haven't seen anything to that effect. 2. [read post]
8 Jul 2007, 1:11 am
We've also included a few related op-eds that Jack wrote before this blog began in January 2003. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 7:49 am
Four of the Justices did talk about the free speech issues here, and they split 2-to-2 (Justices Thomas and Alito would have accepted the free speech claim, and Justices Ginsburg and Sotomayor would have rejected it given the facts of this case, which in their view didn't involve any expression on the cake at all). [read post]
