Search for: "Jacobs v. Marks"
Results 361 - 380
of 567
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2013, 10:09 am
Jacobs, 794 S.W.2d 14 (Tex. 1990), dealing with media reports that repeat third-party allegations. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 7:45 am
Merpel notes that, curiously, both the majority and the minority invoked the judgment of Jacob J (as he then was) in Neutrogena Corporation v Golden Ltd [1996] RPC 473 in support of their respective views. [read post]
21 May 2013, 7:49 am
At Greenwire, Jeremy Jacobs discusses the possible impact that Clapper v. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 9:36 am
‘, Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly April 11, 2013 [Abstract] Digital Media Law Project, Berkman Center: We Have a New Name Professor Patrick Keyzer (lead author), Jane Johnston, Sharon Rodrick, Anne Wallace, Geoff Holland and Mark Pearson. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 2:43 am
But whatever happened to the original litigation in Brüstle v Greenpeace? [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 7:25 am
Jacobs of Greenwire all cover the argument in the case. [read post]
20 Apr 2013, 2:24 pm
Sir Robin Jacob then opened with the historical perspective on parallel rights, starting with an old case – this time the US Playing Cards case of 1902 where the Patent Office objected to registering as a trade mark a design on the back of cards because it was already a registered design. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 11:54 am
AskSir Robin Jacob ...Swearing in. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 4:54 pm
Stilts are definitely nota good place to be ...Last week's inaugural lecture by Sir Robin Jacob reminded this Kat of the existence of a phrase which was heard a good deal more often in past times than one hears it today: "nonsense on stilts!" [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 10:47 pm
The afternoon sessions will focus on copyright and trade marks. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 7:25 am
The Court of Appeals provides guidance on how Iqbal applies to overtime claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act.The case is Lundy v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 4:03 pm
That was 50 years ago today, in Gideon v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 11:24 am
The IPKat's resident expert in the affairs of the higher echelons of the British judiciary informs him that litigation in the UK in the honest concurrent use dispute of Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnick v Anheuser-Busch Inc (noted by the IPKat here) is not going any further. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 7:05 am
Other coverage of the new law comes from Jacob Gershman for The Wall Street Journal Law Blog, Mark Guarino for The Christian Science Monitor, and Suzy Khimm and Sarah Kliff in a video interview for The Washington Post. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 7:55 am
On March 18, Texas will mark the 50th year of Gideon v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 1:01 pm
Never mind, the US Supreme Court has already agonised over these issues in Eldred v Ashcroft and Golan v Holder so we can be comforted that they weren't a problem after all. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 3:58 am
Mark Lewis (@marklewislawyer) [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 9:23 am
It may not.The case is Fortunati v. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 1:00 pm
The CJEU followed A-G Jacobs's logic and when the cases returned to Laddie J he applied the reasoning and held that the claimants would be entitled to damages. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 7:01 am
Let me quote two paragraphs from one of Judge Koh's claim construction orders in Apple v. [read post]
