Search for: "Jacobson v. State"
Results 361 - 380
of 510
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2012, 10:46 am
Christian Louboutin v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 7:59 am
Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 10:46 am
He registered the red lacquered outsole as a trademark with the United States Patent and Trademark Office in 2008. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 7:38 am
Jacobson. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 5:36 pm
Jacobson cites a Florida case on perjury, Cohen v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 10:51 pm
The caption of this case is Evanston Insurance Company v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 8:55 am
Jacobson, 317 S.W.3d 421, 428 (Tex. [read post]
22 May 2012, 8:55 am
Jacobson, 317 S.W.3d 421, 428 (Tex. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 6:50 pm
The appeals court is expected to decide Louboutin v. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 3:04 pm
ACCOUNT STATED – 6 YEARS (N.J. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 8:56 am
The court stopped short of finding that the sentence was substantively unreasonable, calling that a "thorny issue," but did remand the case under Jacobson, which means that if L.M. appeals again, the case will go back to the same panel.In United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 12:00 pm
Jacobson Products. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 1:31 pm
" Jacobson v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 11:59 am
Law Lessons from Jacobson v. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 7:57 pm
The Supreme Court inQualitex v Jacobson (1995) held that a single color can be a valid trade mark "where the color has attained 'secondary meaning' and therefore identifies and distinguishes a particular brand (and thus indicates its 'source')". [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 2:11 pm
So, in reverse order, here they are:United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 4:05 pm
Jacobson to re-file at the state level. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 12:46 pm
But the United States Supreme Court held in Qualitex Co. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 4:40 am
In the recent case of Jacobson v. [read post]
