Search for: "Jason Rantanen"
Results 361 - 380
of 439
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2011, 1:06 pm
Posted by Jason Rantanen There are many sophisticated and nuanced reasons to oppose H.R. 1249, the 140-page patent bill currently pending before the House of Representatives, but the clearest reason for opposition can be stated in quite simple and stark terms: The proposed legislation would undeniably expand the size of the federal bureaucracy and increase the cost and complexity of the American patent system. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 11:46 am
Mark Lemley (Stanford)Thomas Field (New Hampshire)Ted Sichelman (UCSD)Peter Menell (Berkeley)Robert Merges (Berkeley)Lee Petherbridge (Loyola)Gregory Mandel (Temple)Dennis Crouch (Missouri)Scott Hemphill (Columbia)Dan Burk (Irvine)Rochelle Dreyfuss (NYU)Jason Rantanen (Iowa)Jay Kesan (Illinois)Shamnad Basheer (West Bengal National University)James Bessen (Research on Innovation)Gideon Parchomovsky (Penn)Ralph Clifford (U Mass Dartmouth)Jonathan Masur (Chicago)Ronald Mann… [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 3:30 am
By Jason Rantanen Tyco Healthcare Group LP v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 1:11 pm
By Jason Rantanen Two weeks ago, I posted a link to a short essay, written by Lee Petherbridge and myself, about the potential impact of Therasense on the patent system. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 12:57 pm
Becton Dickinson: A First Impression, by Jason Rantanen (Iowa Law) & Lee Petherbridge (Loyola Law).[183 downloads] Legislative Alternatives to the Google Book Settlement, by Pamela Samuelson (Berkeley Law). [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 9:33 pm
By Jason Rantanen Inventio AG v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 12:01 pm
By Jason Rantanen Boston Scientific Corp. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 10:43 pm
by Jason Rantanen I've got a new essay (with Lee Petherbridge) in which we provide an early analysis of what we think are substantial law and policy concerns raised by Therasense. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 6:48 am
” The Court’s rejection of the Federal Circuit’s “deliberate indifference” standard for the more stringent “willful blindness” standard “may have profound implications well beyond the area of intellectual property law,” writes Jason Rantanen at PatentlyO. [read post]
31 May 2011, 8:01 am
By Jason Rantanen Global-Tech Appliances, inc. v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 10:47 pm
By Jason Rantanen Arris Group, Inc. v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 6:49 pm
By Jason Rantanen In re Brimonidine Patent Litigation (Fed. [read post]
13 May 2011, 5:05 pm
By Jason Rantanen Micron Technology, Inc. v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 3:12 pm
By Jason Rantanen TiVo Inc. v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 9:46 am
By Jason Rantanen Billups-Rothenberg, Inc. v. [read post]
1 May 2011, 11:54 am
By Jason Rantanen Rembrandt Data Technologies, LP v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 8:13 am
Jason Rantanen and Dennis Crouch, Akamai v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 9:11 am
By Jason Rantanen In Re Yasuhito Tanaka (Fed. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 9:12 pm
by Jason Rantanen Tomorrow, Monday April 18th, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Microsoft v. i4i, which presents the question whether proving invalidity requires clear and convincing evidence when the prior art on which the invaldity defense rests was not considered by the PTO. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 8:30 pm
By Jason Rantanen Crown Packaging Technology, Inc. v. [read post]
