Search for: "John Doe (CD)" Results 361 - 380 of 407
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2007, 1:14 am
A George Washington University student, known only as "John Doe #3", has made a motion to vacate the RIAA's ex parte discovery order, quash the subpoena issued pursuant to the order, and to dismiss the complaint, in Arista v. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 10:06 am
Does 1-16, the case targeting students at the University of New Mexico, Magistrate Judge Garcia issued an order which required the RIAA to:--provide full sets of papers for each John Doe defendant, and--give the defendants 40 days in which to review the papers with their counsel, and, if so advised, to oppose discovery.September 9, 2007, Order, Requiring 40 days Notice and Full Sets of Papers for John Doe defendants** Document published online at Internet… [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 2:19 am
Google, a New York court has reaffirmed the principle that "John Doe" identity information cannot be disclosed absent:-prior notice to the anonymous person;-affording the anonymous person an opportunity to be heard in opposition to the application; and-an evidentiary showing of a prima facie case against the anonymous person.Application of this principle to the RIAA cases would defeat all of the RIAA's ex parte discovery applications.October 23, 2007, Decision of… [read post]
21 Oct 2007, 9:00 am
Adding or enhancing analysis does not necessarily mean lengthening disclosure, the staff explained. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 10:27 am
Seven (7) North Carolina State University students named as "John Does" have joined together, in LaFace v. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 11:33 am
Does 1-11, the case which targets Oklahoma State University students, "John Does" have made a motion to strike the RIAA's papers, and dismiss the complaint, based upon the RIAA's "contemptuous behavior" in disregard of the Court's rules and a Court order. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 5:26 am
Does 1-38.The student has until October 17th to file a motion to vacate.He is being represented by attorney Steve Robertson, of Robertson, Medlin & Blocker, and is looking for other NC State "John Does" to join him and share expenses.This is the 5th motion of which we are aware by college student "John Does" to vacate the ex parte order. [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 8:43 am
Does 1-33, the RIAA's attempt to obtain the identities of students at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, "John Doe #28", a student at the University, has made a motion to quash the subpoena which has been served.According to the News Sentinel, this is the first attempt to attack the challenge to the RIAA's discovery proceedings in Knoxville.Knoxville News Sentinel articleLitigation documents:Motion to Quash*Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to… [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 10:09 am
(Williams, Carrie)However, the language of the order seems to say that responses are only stayed as to John Does #21 and #37. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 6:37 am
The recording industry has targeted dozens of UT students with 'John Doe' lawsuits, and the subpoenas allow the record labels' attorneys to learn the identities of the students they're suing. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 5:47 am
--> -->[][][][]-->Keywords: digital copyright online law legal download upload peer to peer p2p file sharing filesharing music movies indie independent label freeculture creative commons pop/rock artists riaa independent mp3 cd favorite songs [read post]
10 Jul 2007, 5:02 am
Because the RIAA does not know the names behind the IP addresses, the letters ask the universities to deliver the notices to the proper students, rather than relying upon the ordinary legal mechanisms.Universities should have no part in this extraordinary process. [read post]
4 Jul 2007, 4:11 pm
  In Eros LLC vs John Doe, filed in the U.S. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 10:04 am
In support of its ex parte, "John Doe", discovery applications against college students, the RIAA has been using a declaration by its "Anti-Piracy" Vice President Carlos Linares" (pdf) to show the Judge that it has a good copyright infringement case against the "John Does". [read post]