Search for: "John Doe Holder" Results 361 - 380 of 1,733
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2019, 7:12 am by William Ford
John Allen will deliver introductory remarks, followed by a discussion between Byman and Peter Bergen. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 8:54 am by Josh Blackman
For example, in my article, I offered analyses of several aspects of the clause: what sort of duty does “shall” impose; what does it means to act with “care;” what does it mean to “execute[];” and what does it mean to “execute[]” “the laws” “faithfully. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 8:21 am by Quinta Jurecic
But he also reads it as constraining presidential action, writing that “the concept of ‘faithful execution’ connotes the use of power in the interest of the public, not in the office-holder’s personal interests. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 12:55 pm by John Ross
Concurrence: "Title VII does not grant employees the right to make online rants about gender identity with impunity. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 8:22 am by William Ford
Ideally a US Citizen or green-card holder, but students on OPT will be considered. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 5:00 am by Lev Sugarman
Ideally a US Citizen or green-card holder, but students on OPT will be considered. [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 6:46 pm by David Super
  But, as Bill Eskridge and John Ferejohn have reminded us, we increasingly live in a Republic of Statutes. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 10:59 pm
Are global royalty rates a pragmatic solution to a SEP-dispute, or does it invite inappropriate forum shopping? [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 6:30 am by Jay R. McDaniel, Esq.
   The dividing line between the direct claim of an equity holder and the derivative claim can often be blurry. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 12:09 pm by Lev Sugarman
Sullivan, John I Blanck and Jesse Tampio with moderator Rosa Celorio. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 10:19 am by Adam Feldman
Holder, the decision that ruled Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act was unconstitutional. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 6:04 am by Jim Sedor
New Mexico law does not prohibit ex-lawmakers from lobbying once their terms end. [read post]