Search for: "John Does 1, 2, 3" Results 361 - 380 of 7,842
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2010, 12:00 am by Sex Offender Issues
(a)(2); counts 1 and 2), and one count of failing to register as a sex offender (former § 290, subd. [read post]
28 Jan 2017, 8:27 pm by Rick Houghton
” (See John Bellinger’s discussion of NSPM-2, here.) [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 3:30 am
Claim 1 and Claims 3, 4, 6, and 7 further disclose the use of similar blocks having 'cross-shaped' protrusions. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 4:45 pm by Barbara E. Lichman, Ph.D., J.D.
§ 47524(c)(2)(B) [“the restriction does not create an unreasonable burden on interstate or foreign commerce”]. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 4:05 pm by Tom Smith
If he does have a dog, it isn't a labrador. 3) Biking is inherently dangerous. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 1:27 pm by Matt Miller, Registered Patent Attorney
But, what does it mean and why is it there? [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 5:00 am
The Board pointed out that Sections 1, 2, 3, and 45 of the Trademark Act serve as the statutory basis for the refusal. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 1:04 am by Steve Baird
Ron has provided a preview of his thoughts on his Likelihood of Confusion blog, in a three part series scandalously titled “Indian givers” (parts 1, 2, and 3), suggesting the USPTO assumed this role in ordering the cancellation of the R-Word trademarks of the NFL professional football franchise located in the nation’s capital. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 8:51 pm by structuredsettlements
A certified benefits letter is sought from the annuity issuer to determine (1) if the payments for the proposed transfer do exist; (2) that the seller actually is the owner of the structured settlement payment rights subject to transfer. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 11:05 am
The Program in Ethics and Brain Sciences (PEBS) is a collaborative neuroethics effort of the Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics and the Johns Hopkins Brain Sciences Institute. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 8:37 am by Jeff Kosseff
Doe No. 3, the New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division held in 2001 that before enforcing a subpoena for the identity of an online speaker, the issuer of the subpoena must: (1) notify the anonymous speaker of the subpoena and provide the speaker a reasonable opportunity to respond; (2) specifically identify the speech at issue; (3) allege a prima facie cause of action; (4) present sufficient evidence in support of each element of the claim. [read post]