Search for: "John Does 1 And 2"
Results 361 - 380
of 10,113
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2023, 9:05 pm
But what does it have to do with insider trading? [read post]
15 Apr 2007, 2:57 am
Join together with other students who are being targeted, pool your financial resources, and hire an attorney who is ready, willing, and able to (a) advise you of your rights and (b) fight the RIAA's "John Doe" cases when they are brought.2. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 4:18 am
The TTAB recently decided the appeals from the three Section 2(e)(1) mere descriptiveness refusals summarized below. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 3:28 am
The TTAB recently ruled on the appeals from three Section 2(e)(1) mere descriptiveness refusals summarized below. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 3:55 am
So far this year, the Board has affirmed more than 90% of the Section 2(e)(1) mere descriptiveness refusals reviewed on appeal. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 4:02 am
The TTAB recently ruled on the appeals from the three Section 2(e)(1) mere descriptiveness refusals summarized below. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 6:41 am
The Board has affirmed the first 15 Section 2(e)(1) refusals that it reviewed this year. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 4:07 am
The TTAB recently decided the appeals from three Section 2(e)(1) mere descriptiveness refusals summarized below. [read post]
6 May 2015, 7:09 pm
Profession Emeritis John F. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 2:09 pm
Below, Akin Gump's John Wittenzellner previews Merck & Co., Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 10:00 pm
Patent laws usually have two objectives: 1) To disclose inventions for the benefit of mankind; and 2) To incentivize inventors and investors. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 1:16 pm
2. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 3:23 am
Holder is a "retained" witness does not hinge on whether Petitioner controls his time or compensates him.Read comments and post your comments here.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
20 Jan 2008, 5:22 pm
(Posts in bold are the "must read" posts)1. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 3:10 pm
In comments and in the blog post, Professor McCabe has, like any scary-smart (or even scary smart) lawyer, decided what result he wanted, and then massaged the law to fit the facts: Of course, a person who brings a lawsuit under Government Code Section 82.0651(c) against an attorney for sending a solicitation letter can argue that (1) the early-dismissal statute is not effective until the Supreme Court generates procedural rules implementing it or (2) Section 82.0651(c) itself… [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 11:00 am
"Finally noting that any doubt regarding the application of 2(e)(1) are to be resolved in favor of the applicant, the Board reversed the refusal.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 4:29 am
The Board affirmed a Section 2(e)(1) refusal to register the mark EQUITY RESIDENCE CLUB, finding it merely descriptive of "real estate development services. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 2:57 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 3:28 am
" A consent is required only if the individual bearing the name in the mark will be associated with the mark as used on the goods or services, either because: (1) the person is so well known that the public would reasonably assume a connection between the person and the goods or services; or (2) the individual is publicly connected with the business in which the mark is used.For purposes of this section, a "name" does not have to be a full name, but may be… [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 3:42 pm
In an interesting development, John Huntsman, Jr. [read post]
