Search for: "John Does 1-34" Results 361 - 380 of 888
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2008, 12:12 pm
Annette Parish, a 16-page, 2-1 opinion, the question is "Whether the City is immune from liability for Pairsh's injuries pursuant to the Indiana Tort Claims Act (ITCA), Indiana Code § 34-13-3-1. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 1:25 am by CMS
Straightforward legal principles asking about justification, having analysed, objectively, the impact. 11:34: Michael Fordham QC starts his submissions on behalf of the Counsel General for Wales 11:34: Ronan Lavery QC closes his submissions. 11:31: Ronan Lavery QC returns to the fact that Parliament does have an obligation to protect NI’s interests and that is the essence of the submissions – this is not merely a political game. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 5:12 am by husovec
The reasoning behind the suspicions is not public (and unlikely to be disclosed pending the investigation) but the press release shows that the Commission suspects that X might be violating the following provisions: Article 16(5/6) [submission interfaces & handling of illegal content notices], Article 25(1) [potential misleading character of blue checkmarks], Article 39 [the failure to implement proper ad archives], Article 40(12) [failing to allow accessibility of public data for… [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 8:27 pm
  [34]  Users would simply turn to similar venues hosted in counties like China or Korea, where the IRS would have no jurisdiction. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 5:12 am by Jan von Hein
The EU should take this opportunity to present John Ruggie, the author of the UNGPs, with a special legislative gift. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 5:22 am by Eliav Lieblich
Then, I argue that the geographical nexus requirement, in fact, is extremely difficult to defend in terms of the lex lata, legal policy, literature or practice.[1] This piece does not, however, discuss in detail the obligations in fact owed to Protected Persons in situations or territories once the geographic nexus requirement is rejected. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 7:35 am
But the exteriorized signification of human rights is contested in its interiorization: what, for instance does it mean for such rights to be self-evident, and on whom on they vested? [read post]
22 Dec 2006, 11:31 am
Sandy Levinson, "Creativity," Candor, and Lawyering (July 3, 2006)34. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 3:22 pm by Kevin
Why does he use “dross” instead of “straw”? [read post]
4 Oct 2012, 4:15 am by Victoria VanBuren
Most respondents prefer some form of time limits (57%), while only 6% prefer no time limits at all (34% said it depends on the case). [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 5:00 am by Chelsey Russell
Although the Special Master approval plan does not govern compensation determinations for Mr. [read post]