Search for: "John Stewart Company" Results 361 - 380 of 535
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2013, 4:32 pm by Sean Patrick Donlan
December 2012 546pp Hbk 9781849461405 Revisiting the Contracts Scholarship of Stewart Macaulay On the Empirical and the Lyrical Edited by Jean Braucher, John Kidwell and William C Whitford This book contains the papers prepared for a conference held at the Wisconsin Law School in 2011 to honour the work of Stewart Macaulay, one of the most famous contracts scholars of his generation. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 3:08 pm by John Hochfelder
Trial in November 2008 resulted in a jury finding that two parties caused the accident – the manufacturer of the baggage tractor,  Stewart & Stevenson Services, Inc. and its related companies (30%) and the owner of the vehicle, American Airlines (70%). [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 5:28 am by Rob Robinson
http://bit.ly/Xn9i9o (Sandra Serkes) Technology: Ethics Meets eDiscovery – http://bit.ly/UGb4wj (John Cowling, Daniel Nelson) That E-mail Is Mine; Or Is It? [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 12:22 pm by Dennis Crouch
STEWART (arguing as amicus on behalf of the US Government): I give two answers for that. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 7:24 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
John Simon, chief executive of Simmonds Lumber in Australia, says the company took a decision at board level some years ago that any responsible business should implement a process of due diligence that ensures that any product they purchased comes from a legal source. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 1:00 am by Karen Tani
The book is "most valuable as an exploration of what the word means and why it came along when it did," according to reviewer John McWhorter. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Spot the unintended consequence [White Coat] Dastardly drug companies? [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 5:46 pm
- to approach this analysis without my usual limited-government-libertarian blinders on and instead merely look at the decision as good or bad for the rule of law from the viewpoint of a legal practitioner and someone who understands how lawyers try to interpret the law in order to provide their principals (be they companies, politicians or ordinary citizens) sound advice regarding the legal implications of their future decisions. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 9:31 am by Joe Consumer
As John Stewart put it after Wolf Blitzer began trying to correct CNN's mistake by claiming "widely different" accounts of the decision, "Yes, widely different. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 9:31 am by Joe Consumer
As John Stewart put it after Wolf Blitzer began trying to correct CNN's mistake by claiming "widely different" accounts of the decision, "Yes, widely different. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 9:04 am by Stewart Baker
 But if the companies continue to cooperate we will learn a lot. [read post]
2 May 2012, 5:52 am by Rob Robinson
 - Audio of Judge Chamblin’s Order Approving Predictive Coding – bit.ly/IphMn8 (Trustpoint) SEC on Website & Social Media Archiving (Video) – bit.ly/JSkWmr (Page Freezer) The Why & How of Predictive Coding - bit.ly/In23b5 (James Moeskops, Chris Dale) Technology and Tactics 3 Companies Discuss Social Media Governance Policies - bit.ly/IjTLRo (Alex Vorro, Julie Beck) Analysis: Data Security – The 93 Per Cent Solution… [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 7:33 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
John Tyson, the company's chairman, praised his "dedicated service to the company over the last three decades," and the company paid Mr. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 7:33 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
John Tyson, the company's chairman, praised his "dedicated service to the company over the last three decades," and the company paid Mr. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 7:18 am
 If readers have any favourite examples of their own, they should let John Noble know by emailing him here. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 2:11 am by INFORRM
Lord Justice Leveson suggested at the time he knew they would enter higher bids than Wallis’ company. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 10:46 am by Steve Honig
  What would Jeremy Bentham and John Stewart Mill, the utilitarian philosophers, do if they were on the Court? [read post]