Search for: "John v. Smith" Results 361 - 380 of 2,222
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2018, 3:03 am by Walter Olson
Alameda County] Court denies cert in widely watched Defense Distributed First Amendment case on dissemination of plans for 3-D printed weapon [Smith Pachter, earlier] A historical look: “The American Indian foundation of American gun culture” [David Kopel] “The Supreme Court’s grant of a Contracts Clause case for the first time in a quarter-century reminds me that a certain John G. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 7:10 am by James Romoser
Here’s a round-up of Supreme Court-related news and commentary from around the web: Barrett was trustee at private school with anti-gay policies (Michelle Smith & Michael Biesecker, Associated Press) Supreme Court split in Pa. election case raises questions about how a Justice Barrett would rule (Seung Min Kim & Robert Barnes, The Washington Post) Supreme Court’s Pennsylvania mail ballot ruling tees up test for Barrett (John Kruzel, The Hill) Poll: Majority says… [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 8:27 am by Amanda Frost
  In November, the Court heard oral argument in Smith v. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 12:37 pm
  Presumably people of two different genders, and a fictitious name deliberately so chosen by counsel for the plaintiff (since "John Doe" would have worked equally well). [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 9:45 am by Dennis Crouch
Smith & Nephew, the IPR petitioner. [read post]
11 May 2015, 10:12 pm
   Files: commrep-114hrpt109-pt1-1.pdfRelated Issues: NSA SpyingRelated Cases: Smith v. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 9:24 am by Andrew Hamm
And in the justices’ private conference room, Chief Justice John Roberts has chosen to hang portraits of John Marshall, Benjamin Cardozo, a John Marshall Harlan (wagers as to which one?) [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 5:45 am by Howard Friedman
Another Paper Attempting to Reconcile Abortion Jurisprudence and the Doctrine of Precedent Considering Dobbs v. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 10:30 pm by Rumpole
 On Wednesday the court hears argument in US v. [read post]