Search for: "Jones v. Doe" Results 361 - 380 of 4,112
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2022, 8:19 am by CMS
In this post, Hannah Jones, Assistant Professional Support Lawyer in the Tax team at CMS, comments on Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Coal Staff Superannuation Scheme Trustees Ltd [2022] UKSC 10, a case which concerns the UK’s pre-2014 tax treatment of manufactured overseas dividends. [read post]
15 May 2022, 12:25 am by Frank Cranmer
Philip Jones, Ecclesiastical Law: The Regulation of Cathedral Property: Economic and Environmental. [read post]
12 May 2022, 2:17 am by Michael Douglas
See generally Lili Levi, ‘The Problem of Trans-National Libel’ (2012) 60 American Journal of Comparative Law 507. [4] Dow Jones & Co Inc v Gutnick (2002) 210 CLR 575. [5] But see Michael Douglas, ‘Characterisation of Breach of Confidence as a Privacy Tort in Private International Law’ (2018) 41 UNSW Law Journal 490. [6] Art 4(1); see Andrew Dickinson, The [read post]
5 May 2022, 9:08 pm by Jillian Moss
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 5:01 am by Albert W. Alschuler
  If induced to comply with the House’s subpoenas, Bannon, Meadows, Navarro and Scavino—like their possible co-conspirators John Eastman, Michael Flynn, Jeffrey Clark, Roger Stone and Alex Jones—might invoke the privilege against self-incrimination. [read post]
3 May 2022, 3:25 pm by Gerard Magliocca
On the question of whether the Qualifications Clause makes Congress the exclusive judge of Section Three ineligibility for congressional candidates, one member of the panel cited Jones v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 6:12 am by ernst
De Matos (Brunel University London)The Shadows of Modern State Law: a Visual Genealogy of Dark KnightsSophie Doherty (Dublin City University)What does Justice in the Aftermath of Sexual Violence look like? [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 12:32 pm by John Elwood
The district court dismissed the action for failure to state a claim, concluding that while FNHRA may establish federal standards of care, it does not provide a private right of action that may be enforced under Section 1983. [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 4:47 am by Frank Cranmer
John Picton, Modern Law Review: Lehtimäki v Cooper: Duty and Jurisdiction in Charity Law: on the UKSC judgment on the status of members of charitable companies. [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 1:05 am by Frank Cranmer
: off-topic, but an interesting take on Grainger v Nicholson. [read post]