Search for: "Judicial Standards Commission Rules"
Results 361 - 380
of 3,090
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
One of those topics is rule 14a-8[1] and shareholder proposals, a subject on which many SEC commissioners have provided their views over the years and, indeed, decades.[2] Today, I will add my thoughts on rule 14a-8 to this already robust collection.[3] I have been involved with this rule to some degree during the near-entirety of my 17-plus years with the Commission. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 3:09 pm
He asks the commission to consider an order prohibiting ex-post redaction unless the government has complied with the standard set forth in Rule 505, which mandates that only the judge may close a hearing and only for a justified purpose. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 2:46 pm
[bold in original] There is little sense in deviating from this standard in DMA proceedings. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 9:14 am
In the accompanying press release, the EC called for action in six key areas: A swift adoption of the EU's data protection reform: the strong legislative framework, as proposed by the European Commission in January 2012 (IP/12/46), with clear rules that are enforceable also in situations when data is transferred and processed abroad is, more than ever, a necessity. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 10:19 am
The judge also earned a reprimand from the state Judicial Standards Commission. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 2:37 am
Their task is to enforce, not to issue or modify rulings. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 2:00 am
Specifically, Indiana Code Section 22-9-5-27 states that while the Indiana Civil Rights Commission may adopt rules interpreting the state’s disability discrimination statutes, those rules “must not be in conflict with the provisions of the federal rules adopted under the employment discrimination provisions of the federal Americans with Disabilities Act [ADA]. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 2:00 am
Specifically, Indiana Code Section 22-9-5-27 states that while the Indiana Civil Rights Commission may adopt rules interpreting the state’s disability discrimination statutes, those rules “must not be in conflict with the provisions of the federal rules adopted under the employment discrimination provisions of the federal Americans with Disabilities Act [ADA]. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 6:12 am
The American government and the European Union arrived at a voluntary, opt-in framework by which US companies could submit to a form of regulation that would be considered adequate for European standards. [read post]
25 May 2017, 8:55 am
Arguably, the regulatory uncertain resulted from different interpretations of the conduct standard, based on political party affiliation, rather than the conduct standard itself. [read post]
25 May 2017, 8:55 am
Arguably, the regulatory uncertain resulted from different interpretations of the conduct standard, based on political party affiliation, rather than the conduct standard itself. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 9:30 pm
For any of our rules that are not product safety standards, however, no similar requirement for cost-benefit analysis applies. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 9:49 am
They arose in proceedings brought by the Ontario Securities Commission to have the trial judge, Justice Peter Hryn of the Ontario Court of Justice, removed from the matter because of unfavourable evidentiary rulings and what the OSC claimed was Hryn’s failure to restrain Groia’s aggressive conduct in the case. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 11:59 pm
The Divisional Court has ruled that bail proceedings before the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (“SIAC”) are subject to the same procedural standard under Article 5(4) of the European Convention (the right to liberty) whether they take place before or after the substantive judgment. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 10:22 am
The court’s decision to publish the decision simply stated that “the opinion meets the standards for publication specified in California Rules of Court, rule 8.1105(c). [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 10:16 pm
That standard is not satisfied in this case. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 5:57 am
The states asked the court to vacate the rule, contending that the SEC’s failure to impose any meaningful standards on the “qualified purchasers” eligible to invest in Tier 2 offerings overstepped the Commission’s authority under the JOBS Act and stripped investors of valuable state law protections. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 2:00 pm
However, if lawmakers couldn't agree on a new framework that would make fee-shifting the standard outcome, then it might indeed be better to just wait and see how case law evolves after yesterday's SCOTUS rulings. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 1:38 pm
The Court then turned to the proper standard of judicial review. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 4:20 pm
The Press Recognition Panel is significantly further from politics and government than the Judicial Appointments Commission, yet most would agree the state does not control the judiciary. [read post]
