Search for: "K. K. B., In re" Results 361 - 380 of 2,379
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Allowability of the request for re-establishment[4] According to A 122(1), an applicant can have his rights re-established only if he has sufficiently shown that in spite of all due care required by the circumstances having been taken, he was unable to observe the time limit. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 2:13 am
Amalgamated Bank (In re River Road Hotel Partners, LLC), Nos. 10-3597, 10-3598 (7th Cir. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 2:13 am
Amalgamated Bank (In re River Road Hotel Partners, LLC), Nos. 10-3597, 10-3598 (7th Cir. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
As a result, only the provisions of the EPC 1973 are applied.Computation of the beginning and the end of the TFO[4] In agreement with the parties the Board of appeal bases its considerations on the following factual situation: The wording of claim 1 according to the decision to grant a patent of October 26, 2006, comprised three parallel alternatives A, B, and C, whereas the wording of claim 1 of the patent specification in the relevant German version only contained the alternatives A and… [read post]
1 Nov 2024, 4:43 am
November 19, 2024 - 1 PM [Virtual]: Kuldisak, LLC d/b/a Swag Golf v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 9:36 am by Joshua Glazov
Now we're going to talk about the Lender's attempt to get equal priority in front of the added value pitcher of foreclosure sale money. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Specifically, under the PCT this is a formal deficiency under Article 14(1)(a)(v) in combination with Rule 11.13(a), which can be remedied upon invitation under Article 14(1)(b). [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  Thus, in In re Zyprexa Products Liability Litigation, 489 F. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 6:51 am by Kevin LaCroix
The Court found that a failure to disclose information required by Item 303 in Regulation S-K can’t support a private action under Rule 10b–5(b), as long as the failure does not render any prior statements misleading. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 3:04 am by Juana Vasella
Zudem wäre das zuständige Amt für Kindesschutz in Sofia im Fall einer Rückkehr bereit, für Mutter und Kind angemessene Unterstützungsmassnahmen in die Wege zu leiten. [read post]