Search for: "KING v STATE FUND" Results 361 - 380 of 857
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2012, 8:45 am by Marvin Ammori
The Montana decision goes into great detail about how out of state corporations and "copper kings" would buy and sell the government through expenditures. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 3:19 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Then, BREYTMAN, in a letter to SCHECHTER, dated December 29, 2008, told SCHECHTER that he had twenty days to deliver "my property" but "[y]ou had chosen death you got no one to blame but yourself I am given another 10 days more days to deliver my property after which you fund how unwise your obtuse decision is [sic] [p. 206 of 209 pages attached to February 25, 2009 order to quash the subpoena of December 5, 2008, in Kings County Clerk Minutes for Kings… [read post]
21 May 2009, 2:00 am
Berman KINGS COUNTYTorts Questions Remain if Dog Owner Contributed To Allowing Dog on Sidewalk, Plaintiff's Injury Pisano v. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 1:16 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal Practice Adelphia Defendants Denied New Trial; Claim That Chief Witness' Testimony Was Perjured Is Rejected United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 3:08 pm
Harriman, the railroad king, to Washington to ask him to raise funds to carry New York state. [read post]
26 Sep 2009, 7:33 am
Funds administered by the United States government (such as in Iraq) are now protected. 3. [read post]
22 May 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Hartley & Ors v King Edward VI College, heard 1 February 2017. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 4:16 am by Edith Roberts
Hawaii Wildlife Fund, “a case involving whether the law covers pollution that moves through groundwater before reaching a federal waterway,” and that “[e]nvironmental groups, states, industry and conservatives are watching the case closely, as its outcome could clarify or narrow EPA’s historical interpretation of the types of pollution discharges covered by the Clean Water Act. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 6:45 pm
Movant asserts that the objections to his appointment are based upon his expressed reluctance to invade trust funds to purchase a $2,000,000.00 third home for the objectant in New York City. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Adopting this “friendly” (albeit somewhat ambivalent) position about state funding for private religious schools entailed rejecting his erstwhile strict separationist views. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 6:45 am by admin
Commission on State Mandates (2000) 83 Cal.App.4th 266, 272-274; County of Los Angeles v. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 7:20 am by Jim Gerl
Penna 9/29/9) Dist court certified a class action re the manner that SEA distributes IDEA funds; King v. [read post]