Search for: "Kelly v. Administrator" Results 361 - 380 of 666
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Aug 2014, 10:42 pm
In Matter of Stortecky v Mazzone and Matter of Vitole, Matter of Phelan, it was held that the court bears the ultimate responsibility for approving legal fees that are charged to an estate and has the discretion to determine what constitutes reasonable compensation for legal services rendered in the course of the administration of an estate. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 10:52 pm
In Matter of Stortecky v Mazzone and Matter of Vitole, Matter of Phelan, it was held that the court bears the ultimate responsibility for approving legal fees that are charged to an estate and has the discretion to determine what constitutes reasonable compensation for legal services rendered in the course of the administration of an estate. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 10:42 pm
In Matter of Stortecky v Mazzone and Matter of Vitole, Matter of Phelan, it was held that the court bears the ultimate responsibility for approving legal fees that are charged to an estate and has the discretion to determine what constitutes reasonable compensation for legal services rendered in the course of the administration of an estate. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 10:46 pm
A Staten Island Probate Lawyer said in Matter of Stortecky v Mazzone and Matter of Vitole, Matter of Phelan, it was held that the court bears the ultimate responsibility for approving legal fees that are charged to an estate and has the discretion to determine what constitutes reasonable compensation for legal services rendered in the course of the administration of an estate. [read post]
13 Sep 2014, 10:41 pm
In Matter of Stortecky v Mazzone and Matter of Vitole, Matter of Phelan, it was held that the court bears the ultimate responsibility for approving legal fees that are charged to an estate and has the discretion to determine what constitutes reasonable compensation for legal services rendered in the course of the administration of an estate. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 2:57 pm by William Appleton
  Peter Marguiles analyzed the Fifth Circuit’s Oct. 5 ruling in Texas v. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 10:45 pm
In Matter of Stortecky v Mazzone and Matter of Vitole, Matter of Phelan, it was held that the court bears the ultimate responsibility for approving legal fees that are charged to an estate and has the discretion to determine what constitutes reasonable compensation for legal services rendered in the course of the administration of an estate. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 3:56 am by Edith Roberts
Michael Semler weighs in on Liu v. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 4:22 am
If he was so lawfully dismissed, any pension benefits to which he would otherwise be entitled would be forfeited pursuant to Section 13-173.1 of the New York City Administrative Code. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 9:56 am by Eugene Volokh
. * * * Dear Chairman Lewis, Ranking Member Kelly, and Members of the Committee: Many thanks for inviting me to testify about "How the Tax Code Subsidizes Hate. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 10:00 am by Steve Vladeck
John Kelly as Secretary of Homeland Security and General (ret.) [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
Commentary on Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 2:02 pm by Jay
Kelly Broadcasting Co. (1989) 48 Cal.3d 711, 747.Are You “Absolutely” Sure That is Privileged? [read post]