Search for: "Kelly v. United States"
Results 361 - 380
of 894
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm
Scalia, J., thought Presidents were "officers of the United States" (Lawfare). [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 2:34 pm
As our readers are by now aware, on June 28, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States overturned a legal precedent known as “Chevron deference” by a 6-3 vote. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 3:51 am
At the ABA Journal, Mark Walsh previews one of tomorrow’s cases, Kelly v. [read post]
7 May 2008, 4:39 pm
National Pride at Work v. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 10:53 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 12:52 pm
; Case 4:09-CV-00456-A in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (Fort Worth Division). [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 6:00 am
This was similar to the scenario faced by U.S. courts in Kelly v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 6:00 am
Morris case that is currently being considered, along with two similar cases, by the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 2:01 pm
Or would they have insisted that they all be moved to the United States? [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 11:10 pm
Carcieri, the state itself, and the town of Charlestown — were united in the claim that the federal government has no authority to do that for the Narragansetts. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 7:00 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 7:00 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 4:24 pm
Geerken contends that the district court erred in calculating his sentencing range under the advisory United States Sentencing Guidelines ("U.S.S.G. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 12:51 pm
The due process guarantees in the United States and New York Constitutions require that a defendant be afforded notice of the hearing to determine his or her risk level pursuant to SORA and a meaningful opportunity to respond to the risk level assessment (see § 168-n [3]; People v David W., 95 NY2d 130, 136-140). [read post]
11 May 2017, 8:26 am
In Slade v. [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 7:47 am
In United States ex rel. [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 7:47 am
In United States ex rel. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 1:10 pm
Image via WikipediaIn World Publishing Co. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 3:42 pm
Kelly Issue: Whether 28 U.S.C 2254, the federal habeas provision governing claims adjudicated on the merits in state court, should be applied to claims based on evidence of ineffective assistance of counsel the state court refused to consider. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 4:00 am
United States (06-11206) and Thursday in Peake v. [read post]
