Search for: "Kennedy v. The State Bar" Results 361 - 380 of 1,687
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2014, 9:48 am by Lyle Denniston
The filing in Elmbrook School District v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 5:03 am
Inasmuch as an accord and satisfaction constitutes a contract, it must be shown that the parties set forth the essential elements thereof and had a meeting of the minds to resolve the disputed claim (see Sorrye v Kennedy, 267 AD2d 587, 589 [1999]; Altamuro v Capoccetta, 212 AD2d at 905). [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 1:16 pm by Eugene Volokh
State, reversing an obscenity-as-to-minors conviction that Utah lawyers Troy Booher and Beth Kennedy (many thanks to them!) [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:41 am by Adam Chandler
United States and United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 8:45 am by Victoria Kwan
Kennedy expressed disappointment at the current political climate in the United States, saying, “Half the world is looking at us. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 4:44 am by Amy Howe
” Relying on the Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 9:22 am by Steve Hall
  You can get full information on HB 2965 at this LINK.Related posts, including all Kennedy v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 5:16 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
In the words of Justice Kennedy, writing for a 5-4 majority and as the author of the third in a trilogy of gay rights cases: The Constitution . . . does not permit the State to bar same-sex couples from marriage on the same terms as accorded to couples of the opposite sex. . . . [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 9:23 am by Lyle Denniston
The challengers rely heavily upon a ruling in 2000 by the Supreme Court, in Rice v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
First, a crucial bloc of the Supreme Court (with Justice Kennedy being a key member) in the famous 1992 Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 7:59 am
While interesting to constitutional law scholars and state governments, the Court's decision in Coleman v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 8:02 am by Jason Rantanen
In Tam, the majority stated that “trademarks often have an expressive content” and Kennedy stated that “marks make up part of the expression of everyday life. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 4:07 am by Marty Lederman
  A Court Majority Rejected the Mythical Plenary Power Doctrine and Held that the First Amendment Bars Religious Discrimination in the Admission of Foreign NationalsLet’s start with a very important and remarkable thing about Trump v. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 6:00 am by Chinmayi Sharma
Four years later, in November 2017, the case was finally heard by a chamber of the ECHR alongside two related cases that also brought allegations under Article 8: the Bureau of Investigative Journalism and Alice Ross v. the United Kingdom (2014) and 10 Human Rights Organisations and Others v. the United Kingdom (2015). [read post]